These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. The relative biological effectiveness for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ion beams using passive and scanning techniques evaluated with fully 3D silicon microdosimeters. Tran LT, Bolst D, Guatelli S, Pogossov A, Petasecca M, Lerch MLF, Chartier L, Prokopovich DA, Reinhard MI, Povoli M, Kok A, Perevertaylo VL, Matsufuji N, Kanai T, Jackson M, Rosenfeld AB. Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2299-2308. PubMed ID: 29572856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study. Famulari G, Pater P, Enger SA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jan 01; 100(1):270-277. PubMed ID: 29102279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Microdosimetry of low-energy electrons. Liamsuwan T, Emfietzoglou D, Uehara S, Nikjoo H. Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Dec 01; 88(12):899-907. PubMed ID: 22668077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of electron dose-point kernels in water generated by the Monte Carlo codes, PENELOPE, GEANT4, MCNPX, and ETRAN. Uusijärvi H, Chouin N, Bernhardt P, Ferrer L, Bardiès M, Forssell-Aronsson E. Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2009 Aug 01; 24(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 19694581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Microdosimetric analysis of various mammography spectra: lineal energy distributions and ionization cluster analysis. Verhaegen F, Reniers B. Radiat Res; 2004 Nov 01; 162(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 15624315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations. Pacilio M, Lanconelli N, Lo MS, Betti M, Montani L, Torres AL, Coca PM. Med Phys; 2009 May 01; 36(5):1543-52. PubMed ID: 19544770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Microdosimetric study on influence of low energy photons on relative biological effectiveness under therapeutic conditions using 6 MV linac. Okamoto H, Kohno T, Kanai T, Kase Y, Matsumoto Y, Furusawa Y, Fujita Y, Saitoh H, Itami J. Med Phys; 2011 Aug 01; 38(8):4714-22. PubMed ID: 21928645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Microdosimetric measurements of a monoenergetic and modulated Bragg Peaks of 62 MeV therapeutic proton beam with a synthetic single crystal diamond microdosimeter. Verona C, Cirrone GAP, Magrin G, Marinelli M, Palomba S, Petringa G, Rinati GV. Med Phys; 2020 Nov 01; 47(11):5791-5801. PubMed ID: 32974938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lineal energy and radiation quality in radiation therapy: model calculations and comparison with experiment. Lindborg L, Hultqvist M, Carlsson Tedgren Å, Nikjoo H. Phys Med Biol; 2013 May 21; 58(10):3089-105. PubMed ID: 23594445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of microdosimetric simulations using PENELOPE and PITS for a 25 keV electron microbeam in water. Mainardi E, Donahue RJ, Wilson WE, Blakely EA. Radiat Res; 2004 Sep 21; 162(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 15333002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]