These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 34916065

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analysis of the influence of the facial scanning method on the transfer accuracy of a maxillary digital scan to a 3D face scan for a virtual facebow technique: An in vitro study.
    Amezua X, Iturrate M, Garikano X, Solaberrieta E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 33722381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study.
    Garikano X, Amezua X, Iturrate M, Solaberrieta E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):709-717. PubMed ID: 36115710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Strommer S, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 11. PubMed ID: 38609764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 3: In vitro accuracy of a digital facebow.
    Raffone C, Gianfreda F, Antonacci D, Pompeo MG, Bollero P, Canullo L.
    J Dent; 2023 Oct 11; 137():104622. PubMed ID: 37453655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of a patient 3-dimensional virtual representation obtained from the superimposition of facial and intraoral scans guided by extraoral and intraoral scan body systems.
    Revilla-León M, Zandinejad A, Nair MK, Barmak AB, Feilzer AJ, Özcan M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 11; 128(5):984-993. PubMed ID: 33838919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow.
    Kim SJ, Kang YJ, Kim JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov 11. PubMed ID: 37957064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
    Ries JM, Grünler C, Wichmann M, Matta RE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 11; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of virtual dentofacial patients digitized by three different methods based on 3D facial and dental images.
    Ye H, Ye J, Wang S, Wang Z, Geng J, Wang Y, Liu Y, Sun Y, Zhou Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 11; 131(4):726-734. PubMed ID: 35369981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
    Kois JC, Kois DE, Zeitler JM, Martin J.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar 11; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Kois JC.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Dec 11; 36(12):1675-1686. PubMed ID: 38778662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA, Seidt J, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan 11; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
    Pan F, Liu J, Cen Y, Chen Y, Cai R, Zhao Z, Liao W, Wang J.
    J Dent; 2022 Dec 11; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb 11; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.