These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

92 related items for PubMed ID: 349684

  • 1. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the area of the lateral teeth].
    Mettler P, Friedrich U, Roulet JF.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1978 Apr; 88(4):324-44. PubMed ID: 349684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the lateral dental region].
    Roulet JF, Mettler P, Friedrich U.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Mar; 33(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 274270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparative study on the abrasion behavior of composite filling materials].
    Soltész U, Klaiber B, Pergande C, Richter H.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 May; 34(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 288560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Comparative in vivo wear-resistance measurements between amalgam and composite materials. Results after 2 years].
    Meier C, Lutz F.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 6931810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C, Lutz F.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Wear of dental amalgam.
    Roberts JC, Powers JM, Craig RG.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1977 Jul; 11(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 873943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [The abrasion of composite materials].
    Hotz P.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1975 Mar; 85(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 1055461
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G, Chosack A, Eidelman E.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996 Mar; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [In vitro evaluation of the adaptation and quality of the margins in various composite systems].
    Lutz F, Lüscher B, Ochsenbein H.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1977 Aug; 87(8):752-63. PubMed ID: 272047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fracture strength of Class I versus Class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. I. Standard preparations.
    Purk JH, Eick JD, DeSchepper EJ, Chappell RP, Tira DE.
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jul; 21(7):545-51. PubMed ID: 2094853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. One-year observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations.
    Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Jul; 26(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 5281472
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The use of composites (with referenceto their technological and clinical properties)].
    Sobkowiak EM, Held M.
    Stomatol DDR; 1979 Mar; 29(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 380059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.