These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

316 related items for PubMed ID: 34997288

  • 1. Does robotic-assisted computer navigation improve acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III/IV hip dysplasia? A propensity score case-match analysis.
    Chai W, Xu C, Guo RW, Kong XP, Fu J, Tang PF, Chen JY.
    Int Orthop; 2022 Apr; 46(4):769-777. PubMed ID: 34997288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Application of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip].
    Xu G, Ma M, Zhang S, Liu Y, Kong X, Chai W.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Oct 15; 35(10):1233-1239. PubMed ID: 34651474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.
    Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, Stake CE, Botser IB.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan 15; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?
    Kamara E, Robinson J, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Hepinstall MS.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan 15; 32(1):125-130. PubMed ID: 27499519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Does robotic assisted technology improve the accuracy of acetabular component positioning in patients with DDH?
    Zhou Y, Shao H, Huang Y, Deng W, Yang D, Bian T.
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021 Jan 15; 29(2):23094990211025325. PubMed ID: 34308688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
    Zhang S, Ma M, Kong X, Zhou Y, Chen J, Chai W.
    Int Orthop; 2024 May 15; 48(5):1189-1199. PubMed ID: 38358516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Does acetabular robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty with femoral navigation improve clinical outcomes at 1-year post-operative? A case-matched propensity score study comparing 98 robotic-assisted versus 98 manual implantation hip arthroplasties.
    Coulomb R, Cascales V, Haignere V, Bauzou F, Kouyoumdjian P.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Feb 15; 109(1):103477. PubMed ID: 36375721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acetabular cup placement and offset control in robotic total hip arthroplasty performed through the modified anterolateral approach.
    Avram GM, Prill R, Gurau CD, Georgeanu V, Deleanu B, Russu O, Becker R, Predescu V.
    Int Orthop; 2023 Sep 15; 47(9):2265-2273. PubMed ID: 37160646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Which one is more affected by navigation-assisted cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Anteversion or inclination? A retrospective matched-pair cohort study in Asian physique.
    Oh KJ, Kim BK, Jo MI, Ahn BM.
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018 Sep 15; 26(2):2309499018780755. PubMed ID: 29890935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Accuracy of the Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Comparable With Crowe Type IV and Crowe Type I Dysplasia: A Case-Control Study.
    Ueoka K, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Yoshitani J, Ueno T, Tsuchiya H.
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov 15; 34(11):2686-2691. PubMed ID: 31256919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Robotic-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty in obese patients: a retrospective case-control study.
    Zhang S, Liu Y, Yang M, Ma M, Cao Z, Kong X, Chai W.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Jul 30; 17(1):368. PubMed ID: 35907875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis.
    Sadhu A, Nam D, Coobs BR, Barrack TN, Nunley RM, Barrack RL.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar 30; 32(3):987-991. PubMed ID: 27633947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Application of personalized digital analog assisted acetabular prosthesis precise implantation in Crowe typeⅠand Ⅱ hip dysplasia].
    Chen JX, Yu ZY, Cheng QX, Fu MQ, Shi BN, Yang J, Zhou JJ, Zhao M.
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 Jul 25; 35(7):605-9. PubMed ID: 35859367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS, Yun HH, Hayden B, Kowal JH, Murphy SB.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb 25; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.
    Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Ibrahim MS, Ayuob A, Haddad FS.
    Hip Int; 2021 May 25; 31(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31838874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty via a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in the supine position improves the precision of cup placement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
    Tamaki Y, Goto T, Wada K, Omichi Y, Hamada D, Sairyo K.
    J Orthop Sci; 2024 Mar 25; 29(2):559-565. PubMed ID: 36801090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of Postoperative Instability and Acetabular Cup Positioning in Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Shaw JH, Rahman TM, Wesemann LD, Z Jiang C, G Lindsay-Rivera K, Davis JJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug 25; 37(8S):S881-S889. PubMed ID: 35143923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.