These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

400 related items for PubMed ID: 35004982

  • 1. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy in solid lesions: A multi-center analysis.
    Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Farias GFA, Madruga-Neto AC, Ryou M, Thompson CC.
    World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec 06; 9(34):10507-10517. PubMed ID: 35004982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Hathorn KE, Madruga-Neto AC, Lee LS, Thompson CC.
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun 06; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Flumignan VK, Najdawai F, Ryou M, Lee LS, Thompson CC.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul 06; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI, Chatterjee A, Berger R, Kanber Y, Wyse J, Lam E, Gan I, Auger M, Kenshil S, Telford J, Donnellan F, Quinlan J, Lutzak G, Alshamsi F, Parent J, Waschke K, Alghamdi A, Barkun J, Metrakos P, Chaudhury P, Martel M, Dorreen A, Candido K, Miller C, Adam V, Barkun A, Zogopoulos G, Wong C.
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan 06; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y, Xiong D, Zhao Y, Meng Z, Wu X, Jiang Q, Wang Q, Wu D, Zhang S, Feng Y, Yang A.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jan 06; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, Parisi A, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Parcesepe P, Scarpa A, Manfrin E.
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar 06; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
    Sweeney J, Soong L, Goyal A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr 06; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Needles Provide Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Needles When Sampling Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
    Renelus BD, Jamorabo DS, Boston I, Briggs WM, Poneros JM.
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar 06; 54(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 32892519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug 06; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Keswani RN, Krishnan K, Wani S, Keefer L, Komanduri S.
    Clin Endosc; 2014 May 06; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study.
    Temnykh LM, Rahal MA, Zia Z, Al-Haddad MA.
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2020 Oct 06; 8(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 33163189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A, Wadhwa V, Singh H, Khan S, Gupta K, Liang H, Hussain I, Vargo J, Jang S, Chahal P, Bhatt A, Siddiki H, Erim T, Sanaka MR.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May 06; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, Baron TH.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec 06; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.