These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods. Takagi H, Ishikawa Y, Orii M, Ota H, Niiyama M, Tanaka R, Morino Y, Yoshioka K. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019 Oct; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Australian Patients Referred for Invasive Coronary Angiography. Chua A, Ihdayhid AR, Linde JJ, Sørgaard M, Cameron JD, Seneviratne SK, Ko BS. Heart Lung Circ; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 35501246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A stepwise strategy integrating dynamic stress CT myocardial perfusion and deep learning-based FFRCT in the work-up of stable coronary artery disease. Lyu L, Pan J, Li D, Yu D, Li X, Yang W, Dong M, Han Y, Liang Y, Zhang P, Zhang M. Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):4939-4949. PubMed ID: 38214735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year outcomes of CCTA alone versus machine learning-based FFRCT for coronary artery disease: a single-center, prospective study. Qiao HY, Tang CX, Schoepf UJ, Bayer RR, Tesche C, Di Jiang M, Yin CQ, Zhou CS, Zhou F, Lu MJ, Jiang JW, Lu GM, Ni QQ, Zhang LJ. Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5179-5188. PubMed ID: 35175380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFRCT): sub-analysis from ACCURACY and VCT001 studies. Nakanishi R, Osawa K, Ceponiene I, Huth G, Cole J, Kim M, Nezarat N, Rahmani S, Li D, Gupta S, Rogers C, Dailing C, Budoff MJ. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]