These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 3511760

  • 1. Anaerobic coverage for wound prophylaxis. Comparison of cefazolin and cefoxitin.
    Sarap MD, Scher KS, Jones CW.
    Am J Surg; 1986 Feb; 151(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 3511760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs.
    Scher KS, Jones CW.
    Surgery; 1985 Jul; 98(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 3892746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. An experimental study.
    Scher KS, Wroczynski AF, Jones CW.
    Am J Surg; 1986 Feb; 151(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 3511759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of topical and systemic cefazolin for wound prophylaxis.
    Scher KS, Jones CW, Wroczynski AF.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Feb; 158(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 6364425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Single-dose cephalosporin for prevention of major pelvic infection after vaginal hysterectomy: cefazolin versus cefoxitin versus cefotaxime.
    Hemsell DL, Bawdon RE, Hemsell PG, Nobles BJ, Johnson ER, Heard MC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 156(5):1201-5. PubMed ID: 3555090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section.
    Stiver HG, Forward KR, Livingstone RA, Fugère P, Lemay M, Verschelden G, Hunter JD, Carson GD, Beresford P, Tyrrell DL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan 15; 145(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 6336898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Antibiotic prophylaxis of 1,036 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. A prospective, randomized comparative trial of cefazolin, cefoxitin, and cefotaxime in a prepaid medical practice.
    Jones RN, Wojeski W, Bakke J, Porter C, Searles M.
    Am J Surg; 1987 Apr 15; 153(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 3551643
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cefoxitin versus erythromycin, neomycin, and cefazolin in colorectal operations. Importance of the duration of the surgical procedure.
    Kaiser AB, Herrington JL, Jacobs JK, Mulherin JL, Roach AC, Sawyers JL.
    Ann Surg; 1983 Oct 15; 198(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 6354113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Failure of cephalosporins to prevent Staphylococcus aureus surgical wound infections.
    Kernodle DS, Classen DC, Burke JP, Kaiser AB.
    JAMA; 1990 Feb 16; 263(7):961-6. PubMed ID: 2299764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative cervical microflora shifts after cefoxitin or cefazolin prophylaxis against infection following cesarean section.
    Stiver HG, Forward KR, Tyrrell DL, Krip G, Livingstone RA, Fugere P, Lemay M, Verschelden G, Hunter JD, Carson GD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Aug 01; 149(7):718-21. PubMed ID: 6431820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Combined use of topical and systemic antibiotics.
    Scher KS, Peoples JB.
    Am J Surg; 1991 Apr 01; 161(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 2035760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Discordance Between Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Wound Infection Cultures in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Fong ZV, McMillan MT, Marchegiani G, Sahora K, Malleo G, De Pastena M, Loehrer AP, Lee GC, Ferrone CR, Chang DC, Hutter MM, Drebin JA, Bassi C, Lillemoe KD, Vollmer CM, Fernández-Del Castillo C.
    JAMA Surg; 2016 May 01; 151(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 26720272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rifampin and cefazolin as prophylactic agents. A comparison in an animal model of vascular graft infection.
    Rutledge R, Baker VV, Sherertz R, Johnson G.
    Arch Surg; 1982 Sep 01; 117(9):1164-5. PubMed ID: 7115063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized, double-blind comparison of cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefazolin or placebo as prophylaxis during gastric, small bowel or complicated biliary surgery.
    Louie TJ, Blanchard R, Yaffe C, Lertzman J, McLeod J.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1984 Sep 01; 14 Suppl B():255-62. PubMed ID: 6094449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Infections in cemented prostheses. Antibiotic prophylaxis in an experimental model].
    Aguilar Alfaro L, Fernández-Iruegas D, Soriano García F, Gómez Garcés L.
    Rev Clin Esp; 1982 Dec 31; 167(6):367-9. PubMed ID: 7170357
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraoperative serum concentrations of cefazolin and cefoxitin administered preoperatively at different times.
    DiPiro JT, Vallner JJ, Bowden TA, Clark B, Sisley JF.
    Clin Pharm; 1984 Dec 31; 3(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 6697676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors.
    Edwards WH, Kaiser AB, Tapper S, Edwards WH, Martin RS, Mulherin JL, Jenkins JM, Roach AC.
    J Vasc Surg; 1993 Sep 31; 18(3):470-5; discussion 475-6. PubMed ID: 8377241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.