These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 35167700

  • 1. The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.
    Deer TR, Costandi SJ, Washabaugh E, Chafin TB, Wahezi SE, Jassal N, Sayed D.
    Pain Med; 2022 Apr 08; 23(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 35167700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Deer TR, Chafin TB, Costandi SJ, Qu H, Kim C, Jassal N, Patel K, Calodney A.
    Pain Pract; 2024 Jan 08; 24(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 37661347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS Encore I.
    Pain Physician; 2016 May 08; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
    Staats PS, Chafin TB, Golovac S, Kim CK, Li S, Richardson WB, Vallejo R, Wahezi SE, Washabaugh EP, Benyamin RM, MiDAS ENCORE Investigators.
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct 08; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
    Staats PS, Benyamin RM, MiDAS ENCORE Investigators.
    Pain Physician; 2016 Feb 08; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Objective Real-World Outcomes of Patients Suffering from Painful Neurogenic Claudication Treated with the mild® Procedure: Interim 6-Month Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Deer T, Kim C, Wahezi SE, Qu H, Sayed D, MOTION Study Investigators.
    J Pain Res; 2021 Feb 08; 14():1687-1697. PubMed ID: 34140805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study.
    Chopko B, Caraway DL.
    Pain Physician; 2010 Feb 08; 13(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 20648206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N, Vallejo R, Coleman MH, Benyamin RM.
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar 08; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The durability of minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up.
    Mekhail N, Costandi S, Nageeb G, Ekladios C, Saied O.
    Pain Pract; 2021 Nov 08; 21(8):826-835. PubMed ID: 33942964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
    Mekhail N, Costandi S, Abraham B, Samuel SW.
    Pain Pract; 2012 Jul 08; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR, Kim CK, Bowman RG, Ranson MT, Yee BS.
    Pain Physician; 2012 Jul 08; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S, Franke J, Rauschmann M, Adelt D, Bonsanto MM, Sola S.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr 08; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G, Johnsen LG, Rossvoll I, Andresen H, Storheim K, Zwart JA, Nygaard ØP.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan 15; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S, Ludwig SC, Kepler CK, Anderson DG.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep 15; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Retrospective review of patient self-reported improvement and post-procedure findings for mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression).
    Lingreen R, Grider JS.
    Pain Physician; 2010 Sep 15; 13(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 21102968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety.
    Jain S, Deer T, Sayed D, Chopra P, Wahezi S, Jassal N, Weisbein J, Jameson J, Malinowski M, Golovac S.
    Pain Manag; 2020 Sep 15; 10(5):331-348. PubMed ID: 32609052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections.
    Pryzbylkowski P, Bux A, Chandwani K, Khemlani V, Puri S, Rosenberg J, Sukumaran H.
    Pain Manag; 2022 Mar 15; 12(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 34344197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.