These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 35173395

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.
    Allen CS, Sponsel WE, Trigo Y, Dirks MS, Flynn WJ.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 30(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11885802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparison of detectability of visual field abnormality by frequency doubling technology in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma].
    Horikoshi N, Osako M, Tamura Y, Okano T, Usui M.
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Apr; 105(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 11329948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
    Morbio R, Longo C, De Vitto AML, Comacchio F, Della Porta LB, Marchini G.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 32722931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sector-based analysis of frequency doubling technology sensitivity and optic nerve head shape parameters.
    Iester M, Sangermani C, De Feo F, Ungaro N, Cicinelli S, Tardini MG, Calabria G, Gandolfi S.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 17(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 17415696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Srinivasan M, Agarwal A.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
    North RV, Jones AL, Hunter E, Morgan JE, Wild JM.
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Usefulness of frequency doubling technology as a screening test for glaucoma].
    Saito M, Yamashiro H, Matsumoto H, Shirato S.
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Jan; 105(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11210782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.