These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 35173395

  • 21. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
    Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A, Aspinall P, Taguri A, King AJ.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry as a Means of Screening for Glaucoma and Other Eye Diseases Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Boland MV, Gupta P, Ko F, Zhao D, Guallar E, Friedman DS.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 134(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 26562502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.
    Doozandeh A, Irandoost F, Mirzajani A, Yazdani S, Pakravan M, Esfandiari H.
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 6(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 29392149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang R, Sundaramoorthy L.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Frequency doubling technology and scanning laser tomography in eyes with generalized enlargement of optic disc cupping.
    Kunimatsu S, Tomita G, Araie M, Aihara M, Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Koseki N, Matsumoto S, Yamazaki Y, Yoshikawa K.
    J Glaucoma; 2005 Aug; 14(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 15990608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern.
    Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):571-81. PubMed ID: 10472963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Frequency doubling technology and high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Kalaboukhova L, Lindblom B.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2003 Jun; 81(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 12780403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, Hayashi T, Nawa T, Miyamoto T, Hiro H, Iwasaki A, Sugita M, Glaucoma Screening Project (GSP) Study Group.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Oct; 134(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 12383809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S, Uzun S, Mocan MC, Bozkurt B, Irkec M, Orhan M.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU, Erb C.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Kampmeier J, Eisert B, Buchwald HJ, Lang GK, Lang GE.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.
    Casson R, James B, Rubinstein A, Ali H.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Mar; 85(3):360-2. PubMed ID: 11222348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y, Pereira A, Bowden S, Shi RB, Li Y, Ahmed IIK, Arshinoff SA.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022 Mar; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Correlation between frequency doubling technology and heidelberg retina tomograph.
    Iester M, Traverso CE, De Feo F, Sanna G, Altieri M, Vittone P, Calabria G.
    J Glaucoma; 2005 Oct; 14(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 16148585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Frequency-doubling perimetry in examination of open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defect].
    Wu L, Suzuki Y, Kunimatsu S, Araie M, Yao K.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 38(12):717-20. PubMed ID: 12654219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.
    Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C.
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.