These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 35176178

  • 1. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of Fit Assessment.
    Papaspyridakos P, AlFulaij F, Bokhary A, Sallustio A, Chochlidakis K.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 35176178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication.
    Papaspyridakos P, Bedrossian A, Kudara Y, Ntovas P, Bokhary A, Chochlidakis K.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 36779654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L, Chen YW, Kostagianni A, Finkelman M, Papathanasiou A, Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Gotsis S, Bokhary A, Sicilia E, Kudara Y, Bedrossian A, Chochlidakis K.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with the Double Digital Scanning (DDS) Technique: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K, Romeo D, Ercoli C, Papaspyridakos P.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):761-765. PubMed ID: 35871300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
    Marinis A, Papaspyridakos P, Sicilia E, Bernandes SR, Touloumi F, Chochlidakis K, Weber HP.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P, Aly NM, Al-Harbi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P, Hirayama H, Chen CJ, Ho CH, Chronopoulos V, Weber HP.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P, Aly NM, Al-Harbi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A, Chen YW, Kostagianni A, Finkelman M, Papathanasiou A, Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: A case report.
    Meneghetti P, Moura GF, Tavelli L, Li J, Siqueira R, Wang HL, Mendonça G.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 34213055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of 3D printer, implant analog and angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts.
    Rutkūnas V, Jegelevičius D, Gedrimienė A, Revilla-León M, Pletkus J, Akulauskas M, Eyüboğlu TF, Özcan M, Auškalnis L.
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105135. PubMed ID: 38885735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Finkelman M, Sicilia E, Gotsis S, Chen YW, Vazouras K, Chochlidakis K.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.