These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


150 related items for PubMed ID: 35177567

  • 1. Performance Evaluation of the i-SmartCare 10 Analyzer and Method Comparison of Six Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyzers.
    Kim SM, Park HD.
    Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul 01; 42(4):467-472. PubMed ID: 35177567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analytical and pre-analytical performance characteristics of a novel cartridge-type blood gas analyzer for point-of-care and laboratory testing.
    Oyaert M, Van Maerken T, Bridts S, Van Loon S, Laverge H, Stove V.
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar 01; 53():116-126. PubMed ID: 29339078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.
    Uyanik M, Sertoglu E, Kayadibi H, Tapan S, Serdar MA, Bilgi C, Kurt I.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2015 Apr 01; 75(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 25431133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A Comparative Assessment of the Nova Stat Profile Prime Plus® Critical Care Analyzer.
    Jawa A, Motara F, Moolla M, Laher AE.
    Cureus; 2020 Aug 21; 12(8):e9932. PubMed ID: 32968593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Analytical performance evaluation of the new GEM® Premier™ 5000 analyzer in comparison to the GEM® Premier™ 4000 and the RapidPoint® 405 systems.
    Mion MM, Bragato G, Zaninotto M, Alessandroni J, Bernardini S, Plebani M.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Nov 21; 486():313-319. PubMed ID: 30118673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Analytical performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas analyzers.
    De Koninck AS, De Decker K, Van Bocxlaer J, Meeus P, Van Hoovels L.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Feb 01; 50(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22706251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers for blood gas and lactate measurements.
    Indrasari ND, Wonohutomo JP, Sukartini N.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun 01; 33(5):e22885. PubMed ID: 30924550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers.
    Leino A, Kurvinen K.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Jul 01; 49(7):1187-91. PubMed ID: 21504373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Performance of a multi-profile critical care testing analyzer.
    Vanavanan S, Chittamma A.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008 Jul 01; 46(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17663637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Emergency medical technician-performed point-of-care blood analysis using the capillary blood obtained from skin puncture.
    Kim C, Kim H.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jul 01; 36(7):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 29519760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of i-STAT portable clinical analyzer in a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit.
    Murthy JN, Hicks JM, Soldin SJ.
    Clin Biochem; 1997 Jul 01; 30(5):385-9. PubMed ID: 9253514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Steinfelder-Visscher J, Weerwind PW, Teerenstra S, Brouwer MH.
    Perfusion; 2006 Jan 01; 21(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 16485697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of lactate values between point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers.
    Karon BS, Scott R, Burritt MF, Santrach PJ.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jul 01; 128(1):168-71. PubMed ID: 17580286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of blood gas results obtained on Abbott i-Stat® and on Radiometer ABL 800 Flex® analyzers Impact for the clinical decision.
    Jouffroy R, Laney M, Leguillier T, Nivet-Antoine V, Beaudeux JL.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2022 Nov 01; 80(6):521-525. PubMed ID: 36696550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance of Gem Premier blood gas/electrolyte analyzer evaluated.
    Jacobs E, Nowakowski M, Colman N.
    Clin Chem; 1993 Sep 01; 39(9):1890-3. PubMed ID: 8375066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multilevel qualification of a large set of blood gas analyzers: Which performance goals?
    Kuster N, Bargnoux AS, Badiou S, Dupuy AM, Piéroni L, Cristol JP.
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Dec 01; 74():47-53. PubMed ID: 31533025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of a hand-held blood gas analyzer for rapid determination of blood gases, electrolytes and metabolites in intensive care setting.
    Luukkonen AA, Lehto TM, Hedberg PS, Vaskivuo TE.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Apr 01; 54(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 26457784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.
    Walton HG, Boucher DM, Marroquin R.
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2003 Mar 01; 35(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 12680492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.