These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 35206153

  • 21. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant.
    Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 29(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 11515644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Retention Ability and Anticaries Effect of a Glass Ionomer-based and a Resin-based Fissure Sealant on Permanent First Molars: An In Vivo Study.
    Mathew SR, Narayanan RK, Vadekkepurayil K, Puthiyapurayil J.
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019 Aug; 12(6):553-559. PubMed ID: 32440074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant.
    Raadal M, Utkilen AB, Nilsen OL.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Dec; 6(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 9161190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An in vivo one-year comparative evaluation.
    Singh C, Kaur K, Kapoor K.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019 Dec; 37(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31710012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention--results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Liu BY, Xiao Y, Chu CH, Lo EC.
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May 19; 14():54. PubMed ID: 24886444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yıldız E.
    J Dent; 2014 Feb 19; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X, Zhang W, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan 19; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant protected with two different resin-based agents over a 2-year follow-up period.
    Ulusoy AT, Tunc ES, Bayrak Ş.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Mar 19; 18(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 28494595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness, in a randomized trial, of glass-ionomer-based and resin sealant materials after 4 yr.
    Goldman AS, Chen X, Fan M, Frencken JE.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Oct 19; 124(5):472-479. PubMed ID: 27666137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington HV.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct 08; (4):CD001830. PubMed ID: 18843625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive.
    Ntaoutidou S, Arhakis A, Tolidis K, Kotsanos N.
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec 08; 19(6):431-437. PubMed ID: 30328064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
    Cabral RN, Faber J, Otero SAM, Hilgert LA, Leal SC.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec 08; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.
    Zhang W, Chen X, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE.
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017 Dec 08; 15(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 28752157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Caries prevention effect of resin based sealants and glass ionomor sealants].
    Liu Y, Rong W, Zhao X, Wang M, Jiang Q, Wang W.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr 08; 49(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 24969592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries].
    Yan WJ, Zheng JJ, Chen XX.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct 18; 50(5):911-914. PubMed ID: 30337757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study.
    Hasanuddin S, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Srilaxmi N, Rani ST, Rajesh A.
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct 18; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.
    Amin HE.
    J Dent Hyg; 2008 Oct 18; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.