These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Experiences with rayvist and iopromid in head and body CT. Zeitler E, Böhnlein K, Gailer H, Lindner R, Richter EI. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():162-72. PubMed ID: 6139073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Renal contrast radiography study in hypertensive patients: comparison of the nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast media]. Mannella P, Tataranni G, Benea G, Logallo G, Farinelli A. Radiol Med; 1983 Jun; 69(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 6665240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of an ionic (ioglicinate) with a non-ionic (iohexol) contrast medium in renal computed tomography]. Weigert F, Hartmann A, Rohde U. Rontgenpraxis; 1986 May; 39(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 3523788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study. Egeblad M, Nielsen NT, Fries J, Laulund S. Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral). Skalpe IO, Anke IM. Neuroradiology; 1983 Aug; 25(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 6350922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]