These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 3521175

  • 1. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB, Arentz NP.
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D.
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Mar; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS, Hill DA, Gordy LW, Lane J, Cavanagh D.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M, Nieberg RK, Mulcahy D, Wiesmeier E.
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Improved endocervical cell yield with Cytobrush.
    Deckert JJ, Staten SF, Palermo V.
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Jun 01; 26(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 3379366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
    Kawaguchi K, Nogi M, Ohya M, Nishikawa Y, Kobayashi TK.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep 01; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.