These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


233 related items for PubMed ID: 35213695

  • 1. Great expectations of IVF patients: the role of gender, dispositional optimism and shared IVF prognoses.
    Devroe J, Peeraer K, D'Hooghe TM, Boivin J, Laenen A, Vriens J, Dancet EAF.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May 03; 37(5):997-1006. PubMed ID: 35213695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Anxiety in couples undergoing IVF: evidence from E-Freeze randomised controlled trial.
    Li Y, McLeish J, Hardy P, Cole C, Carson C, Alderdice F, Maheshwari A.
    Hum Reprod Open; 2024 May 03; 2024(3):hoae037. PubMed ID: 39055488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.
    Koedooder R, Singer M, Schoenmakers S, Savelkoul PHM, Morré SA, de Jonge JD, Poort L, Cuypers WJSS, Beckers NGM, Broekmans FJM, Cohlen BJ, den Hartog JE, Fleischer K, Lambalk CB, Smeenk JMJS, Budding AE, Laven JSE.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun 04; 34(6):1042-1054. PubMed ID: 31119299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessing couples' preferences for fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a discrete choice experiment.
    Abdulrahim B, Scotland G, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct 18; 36(11):2891-2903. PubMed ID: 34550368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Talking about possible IVF/ICSI failure and need for multiple cycles in treatment planning: qualitative investigation of multi-cycle planning and its acceptability to patients and staff.
    Harrison C, Boivin J, Gameiro S.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar 01; 37(3):488-498. PubMed ID: 35040994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cumulative delivery rate per aspiration IVF/ICSI cycle in POSEIDON patients: a real-world evidence study of 9073 patients.
    Esteves SC, Yarali H, Vuong LN, Carvalho JF, Özbek İY, Polat M, Le HL, Pham TD, Ho TM, Humaidan P, Alviggi C.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul 19; 36(8):2157-2169. PubMed ID: 34179973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
    Cameron NJ, Bhattacharya S, McLernon DJ.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct 01; 35(10):2365-2374. PubMed ID: 32949234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Discussing the possibility of fertility treatment being unsuccessful as part of routine care offered at clinics: patients' experiences, willingness, and preferences.
    Sousa-Leite M, Costa R, Figueiredo B, Gameiro S.
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jul 05; 38(7):1332-1344. PubMed ID: 37196325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Patient willingness, preferences and decision-making about planning for three complete cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment.
    Harrison C, Gameiro S, Boivin J.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr 20; 36(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 33744926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. What do women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) understand about their chance of IVF success?
    McMahon C, Hammarberg K, Lensen S, Wang R, Mol BW, Vollenhoven BJN.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan 05; 39(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 37976406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The impact of luteal serum progesterone levels on live birth rates-a prospective study of 602 IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Thomsen LH, Kesmodel US, Erb K, Bungum L, Pedersen D, Hauge B, Elbæk HO, Povlsen BB, Andersen CY, Humaidan P.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug 01; 33(8):1506-1516. PubMed ID: 29955789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.
    Li Z, Wang AY, Bowman M, Hammarberg K, Farquhar C, Johnson L, Safi N, Sullivan EA.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul 01; 33(7):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 29897449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cumulative live birth rates in low-prognosis women.
    Leijdekkers JA, Eijkemans MJC, van Tilborg TC, Oudshoorn SC, van Golde RJT, Hoek A, Lambalk CB, de Bruin JP, Fleischer K, Mochtar MH, Kuchenbecker WKH, Laven JSE, Mol BWJ, Torrance HL, Broekmans FJM, OPTIMIST study group.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun 04; 34(6):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 31125412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
    Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Dovere L, Tacconi L, Soscia D, Giancani A, Scepi E, Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar 18; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Predicting the chance on live birth per cycle at each step of the IVF journey: external validation and update of the van Loendersloot multivariable prognostic model.
    Devroe J, Peeraer K, Verbeke G, Spiessens C, Vriens J, Dancet E.
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct 08; 10(10):e037289. PubMed ID: 33033089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
    Leijdekkers JA, Eijkemans MJC, van Tilborg TC, Oudshoorn SC, McLernon DJ, Bhattacharya S, Mol BWJ, Broekmans FJM, Torrance HL, OPTIMIST group.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep 01; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A large observational data study supporting the PROsPeR score classification in poor ovarian responders according to live birth outcome.
    Lehert P, Arvis P, Avril C, Massin N, Parinaud J, Porcu G, Rongières C, Sagot P, Wainer R, D'Hooghe T.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 May 17; 36(6):1600-1610. PubMed ID: 33860313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.
    Paul RC, Fitzgerald O, Lieberman D, Venetis C, Chambers GM.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun 01; 35(6):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 32380547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women.
    Le KD, Vuong LN, Ho TM, Dang VQ, Pham TD, Pham CT, Norman RJ, Mol BWJ.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct 01; 33(10):1907-1914. PubMed ID: 30239784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cumulative live birth rates after one or more complete cycles of IVF: a population-based study of linked cycle data from 178,898 women.
    McLernon DJ, Maheshwari A, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar 01; 31(3):572-81. PubMed ID: 26783243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.