These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. Heintze SD, Rousson V. J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):407-31. PubMed ID: 23082310 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Aug; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition. Yengopal V, Harnekar SY, Patel N, Siegfried N. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct 17; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries. Dorri M, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Walsh T, Marinho VC, Sheiham Deceased A, Zaror C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec 28; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial. Bayazıt EÖ, Başeren M, Meral E. J Dent; 2023 Apr 28; 131():104473. PubMed ID: 36863696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F. J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May 28; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations. Wafaie RA, Ibrahim Ali A, El-Negoly SAE, Mahmoud SH. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr 28; 35(3):538-555. PubMed ID: 36564970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study. Hatirli H, Yasa B, Çelik EU. Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep 28; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG. J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar 28; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Dent Mater; 1998 Jul 28; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]