These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

136 related items for PubMed ID: 3522369

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Confirmation of suspicious cytological smears by the results of histopathological examinations in the prevention of cervical cancer].
    Szlachta A, Klus K, Kelm R, Zwoźniak M, Gransort K, Kulpiński K.
    Ginekol Pol; 1984 Jan; 55(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 6745699
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frozen sections in cervical conization. A cytohistopathologic approach in the early diagnosis of carcinoma cervix.
    Gupta RK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1971 Aug; 38(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 4934629
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Mesonephroid hyperplasia of the uterine cervix].
    Rosen A, Klein M, Preiser J.
    Pathologe; 1992 Apr; 13(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 1603773
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Possibilities of using computer analysis in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
    Wiśniewski L, Skawiński W, Makowski T, Jezuita J.
    Ginekol Pol; 1980 Oct; 51(10):951-7. PubMed ID: 7005032
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Histopathological pictures of sections of the cervix uteri in Papanicolau cytograms III, IV and V].
    Danilewicz M, Tuka E, Wagrowska-Danilewicz M.
    Patol Pol; 1985 Oct; 36(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 3835508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP, Gaillard HL, Go DM.
    Acta Cytol; 1987 Oct; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Analysis of "suspicious" vaginal smears].
    Krupa B, Kaźmierczak W, Dynia J, Wojcieszek A.
    Ginekol Pol; 1979 Dec; 50(12):1019-22. PubMed ID: 535767
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Correlation between the cytology, coposcopy and the histopathology of abnormal lesions of the cervix].
    Michon B, Demianczuk N.
    Union Med Can; 1977 May; 106(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 867611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Bethesda System and patient management strategies.
    Helmuth RA, Moriarty AT, Schwenk GR.
    Indiana Med; 1992 May; 85(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 1431035
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cervical biopsy versus conization.
    Selim MA, So-Bosita JL, Blair OM, Little BA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 41(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 4684200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
    Parker A, Ueki M.
    N Z Med J; 1986 Jun 11; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Endocervical cells, pathology of the cervix, and time.
    Vollmer RT.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan 11; 117(1):166-7. PubMed ID: 11789723
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.