These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

287 related items for PubMed ID: 35235410

  • 1. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K, Smiljanić R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr 04; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H, Smiljanic R, Chandrasekaran B.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec 18; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Dec 18; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intelligibility of Natively and Nonnatively Produced English Speech Presented in Noise to a Large Cohort of United States Service Members.
    Bieber RE, Makashay MJ, Sheffield BM, Brungart DS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jul 09; 67(7):2454-2472. PubMed ID: 38950169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L, Bradlow AR, Dhar S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr 09; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
    Jung YJ, Dmitrieva O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan 09; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C, Galvin JJ, Chang YP, Xu A, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr 01; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ, Phelps JE, Smiljanic R, Chandrasekaran B.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct 01; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
    Stuart A, Zhang J, Swink S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr 01; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM, Avivi-Reich M, Schneider BA.
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov 01; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct 01; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels.
    Stringer L, Iverson P.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul 15; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nonnative audiovisual speech perception in noise: dissociable effects of the speaker and listener.
    Xie Z, Yi HG, Chandrasekaran B.
    PLoS One; 2014 Jul 15; 9(12):e114439. PubMed ID: 25474650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
    Bent T, Buchwald A, Pisoni DB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov 15; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr 24; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC, Chandrasekaran B, Smiljanic R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan 24; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan 24; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L, Van Engen K, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec 24; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners.
    Nakamura K, Gordon-Salant S.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb 24; 32(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 20628303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.