These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

287 related items for PubMed ID: 35235410

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H, Smiljanic R, Chandrasekaran B.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec 18; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Dec 18; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intelligibility of Natively and Nonnatively Produced English Speech Presented in Noise to a Large Cohort of United States Service Members.
    Bieber RE, Makashay MJ, Sheffield BM, Brungart DS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jul 09; 67(7):2454-2472. PubMed ID: 38950169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM, Avivi-Reich M, Schneider BA.
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov 09; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
    Bent T, Buchwald A, Pisoni DB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov 09; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr 24; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC, Chandrasekaran B, Smiljanic R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan 24; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan 24; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L, Van Engen K, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec 24; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.