These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

241 related items for PubMed ID: 35237388

  • 1. A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry-meteorology feedbacks on air quality.
    Wang K, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wong DC, Pleim J, Mathur R, Kelly JT, Bell M.
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Nov 26; 14(11):7189-7221. PubMed ID: 35237388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.
    Appel KW, Napelenok SL, Foley KM, Pye HOT, Hogrefe C, Luecken DJ, Bash JO, Roselle SJ, Pleim JE, Foroutan H, Hutzell WT, Pouliot GA, Sarwar G, Fahey KM, Gantt B, Gilliam RC, Heath NK, Kang D, Mathur R, Schwede DB, Spero TL, Wong DC, Young JO.
    Geosci Model Dev; 2017 Nov 26; 10(4):1703-1732. PubMed ID: 30147852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part II: Air quality projections and the interplay between emissions and climate change.
    Campbell P, Zhang Y, Yan F, Lu Z, Streets D.
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul 26; 238():918-930. PubMed ID: 29684896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.
    Appel KW, Bash JO, Fahey KM, Foley KM, Gilliam RC, Hogrefe C, Hutzell WT, Kang D, Mathur R, Murphy BN, Napelenok SL, Nolte CG, Pleim JE, Pouliot GA, Pye HOT, Ran L, Roselle SJ, Sarwar G, Schwede DB, Sidi FI, Spero TL, Wong DC.
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 May 20; 14():2867-2897. PubMed ID: 34676058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The potential effects of climate change on air quality across the conterminous U.S. at 2030 under three Representative Concentration Pathways.
    Nolte CG, Spero TL, Bowden JH, Mallard MS, Dolwick PD.
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2018 May 20; 18(20):15471-15489. PubMed ID: 30972111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Modeling PM2.5 and O3 with aerosol feedbacks using WRF/Chem over the Sichuan Basin, southwestern China.
    Wang P, Qiao X, Zhang H.
    Chemosphere; 2020 Sep 20; 254():126735. PubMed ID: 32325353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ modeling system for air quality evaluation in São Paulo megacity with a 2008 experimental campaign data.
    de Almeida Albuquerque TT, de Fátima Andrade M, Ynoue RY, Moreira DM, Andreão WL, Dos Santos FS, Nascimento EGS.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Dec 20; 25(36):36555-36569. PubMed ID: 30374719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a seven-year air quality simulation using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models in the eastern United States.
    Zhang H, Chen G, Hu J, Chen SH, Wiedinmyer C, Kleeman M, Ying Q.
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar 01; 473-474():275-85. PubMed ID: 24374589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modeling an air pollution episode in northwestern United States: identifying the effect of nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compound emission changes on air pollutants formation using direct sensitivity analysis.
    Tsimpidi AP, Trail M, Hu Y, Nenes A, Russell AG.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct 01; 62(10):1150-65. PubMed ID: 23155861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Updates to the Noah Land Surface Model in WRF-CMAQ to Improve Simulated Meteorology, Air Quality, and Deposition.
    Campbell PC, Bash JO, Spero TL.
    J Adv Model Earth Syst; 2019 Jan 01; 11(1):231-256. PubMed ID: 31007838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of the offline-coupled GFSv15-FV3-CMAQv5.0.2 in support of the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability over the contiguous United States.
    Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang K, Tong D, Lee P, Tang Y, Huang J, Campbell PC, Mcqueen J, Pye HOT, Murphy BN, Kang D.
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Jun 29; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 34367521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influencing factors of PM2.5 and O3 from 2016 to 2020 based on DLNM and WRF-CMAQ.
    Duan W, Wang X, Cheng S, Wang R, Zhu J.
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Sep 15; 285():117512. PubMed ID: 34090076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. GPS-ZTD data assimilation and its impact on wintertime haze prediction over North China Plain using WRF 3DVAR and CMAQ modeling system.
    Gao L, Liu Z, Chen D, Yan P, Zhang Y, Hu H, Liang H, Liang X.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec 15; 28(48):68523-68538. PubMed ID: 34273077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Unveiling tropospheric ozone by the traditional atmospheric model and machine learning, and their comparison:A case study in hangzhou, China.
    Feng R, Zheng HJ, Zhang AR, Huang C, Gao H, Ma YC.
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Sep 15; 252(Pt A):366-378. PubMed ID: 31158665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Application and evaluation of two air quality models for particulate matter for a southeastern U.S. episode.
    Zhang Y, Pun B, Wu SY, Vijayaraghavan K, Seigneur C.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Dec 15; 54(12):1478-93. PubMed ID: 15648386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dynamic Evaluation of Two Decades of WRF-CMAQ Ozone Simulations over the Contiguous United States.
    Astitha M, Luo H, Rao ST, Hogrefe C, Mathur R, Kumar N.
    Atmos Environ (1994); 2017 Dec 15; 164():102-116. PubMed ID: 30078987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The impact of US wildland fires on ozone and particulate matter: a comparison of measurements and CMAQ model predictions from 2008 to 2012.
    Wilkins JL, Pouliot G, Foley K, Appel W, Pierce T.
    Int J Wildland Fire; 2018 Dec 15; 27(10):. PubMed ID: 33424209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Investigating air pollutant concentrations, impact factors, and emission control strategies in western China by using a regional climate-chemistry model.
    Yang J, Kang S, Ji Z, Yin X, Tripathee L.
    Chemosphere; 2020 May 15; 246():125767. PubMed ID: 31927371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part I: Projected emissions, simulation design, and model evaluation.
    Campbell P, Zhang Y, Yan F, Lu Z, Streets D.
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul 15; 238():903-917. PubMed ID: 29677550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States.
    Hogrefe C, Liu P, Pouliot G, Mathur R, Roselle S, Flemming J, Lin M, Park RJ.
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2018 Jul 15; 18(5):3839-3864. PubMed ID: 30079085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.