These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
310 related items for PubMed ID: 35245804
1. Environmental enrichment in commercial flocks of aviary housed laying hens: relationship with plumage condition and fearfulness. Tahamtani FM, Kittelsen K, Vasdal G. Poult Sci; 2022 Apr; 101(4):101754. PubMed ID: 35245804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens. Heerkens JL, Delezie E, Kempen I, Zoons J, Ampe B, Rodenburg TB, Tuyttens FA. Poult Sci; 2015 Sep; 94(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 26188031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Feather Pecking in Non-Beak-Trimmed and Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens on Commercial Farms with Aviaries. Schwarzer A, Plattner C, Bergmann S, Rauch E, Erhard M, Reese S, Louton H. Animals (Basel); 2021 Oct 28; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34827817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Aviary Transect-a practical welfare assessment tool to improve the management of cage-free laying hens. Vasdal G, Newberry RC, Estevez I, Kittelsen K, Marchewka J. Poult Sci; 2023 Jun 28; 102(6):102659. PubMed ID: 37030260 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of pecking stones and age on feather cover, hen mortality, and performance in free-range laying hens. Iqbal Z, Drake K, Swick RA, Taylor PS, Perez-Maldonado RA, Ruhnke I. Poult Sci; 2020 May 28; 99(5):2307-2314. PubMed ID: 32359565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of edible environmental enrichments during the rearing and laying periods in a littered aviary-Part 1: integument condition in pullets and laying hens. Schreiter R, Damme K, Klunker M, Raoult C, von Borell E, Freick M. Poult Sci; 2020 Nov 28; 99(11):5184-5196. PubMed ID: 33142434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Flock Factors Correlated with Elevated Mortality in Non-Beak Trimmed Aviary-Housed Layers. Kittelsen KE, Tahamtani F, Moe RO, Gretarsson P, Vasdal G. Animals (Basel); 2022 Dec 17; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 36552497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming during the rearing period on subsequent feather damage due to feather-pecking in laying hens. Hartcher KM, Tran KT, Wilkinson SJ, Hemsworth PH, Thomson PC, Cronin GM. Poult Sci; 2015 May 17; 94(5):852-9. PubMed ID: 25717088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of litter provision during early rearing and environmental enrichment during the production phase on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Tahamtani FM, Brantsæter M, Nordgreen J, Sandberg E, Hansen TB, Nødtvedt A, Rodenburg TB, Moe RO, Janczak AM. Poult Sci; 2016 Dec 01; 95(12):2747-2756. PubMed ID: 27566727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Feather eating and its associations with plumage damage and feathers on the floor in commercial farms of laying hens. Riber AB, Hinrichsen LK. Animal; 2016 Jul 01; 10(7):1218-24. PubMed ID: 26832649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems. Blatchford RA, Fulton RM, Mench JA. Poult Sci; 2016 Jan 01; 95(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 26240396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada. Petrik MT, Guerin MT, Widowski TM. Poult Sci; 2015 Apr 01; 94(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 25713398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling of feather pecking behavior in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens: variance component and trait-based approach. Sun Y, Ellen ED, van der Poel JJ, Parmentier HK, Bijma P. Poult Sci; 2014 Apr 01; 93(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 24706953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers. Riber AB, Hinrichsen LK. Front Vet Sci; 2017 Apr 01; 4():222. PubMed ID: 29326955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of welfare parameters in laying hens on the basis of a Bavarian survey. Louton H, Bergmann SM, Rauch E, Reese S, Erhard MH, Hoeborn C, Schwarzer A, Liebers C. Poult Sci; 2017 Sep 01; 96(9):3199-3213. PubMed ID: 28651355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Litter use by laying hens in a commercial aviary: dust bathing and piling. Campbell DL, Makagon MM, Swanson JC, Siegford JM. Poult Sci; 2016 Jan 01; 95(1):164-75. PubMed ID: 26354762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens - the Aviary Transect method. Vasdal G, Marchewka J, Newberry RC, Estevez I, Kittelsen K. Poult Sci; 2022 Jan 01; 101(1):101533. PubMed ID: 34784510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Laying hens in aviaries with different litter substrates: Behavior across the flock cycle and feather lipid content. Campbell DLM, Ali ABA, Karcher DM, Siegford JM. Poult Sci; 2017 Sep 01; 96(11):3824-3835. PubMed ID: 29050413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Providing ramps during lay has larger impacts on laying hens than ramps at rearing. Toscano MJ, Jalali AS, Siegford JM, Stratmann A. Poult Sci; 2024 Oct 01; 103(10):104101. PubMed ID: 39137495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fear, stress, and feather pecking in commercial white and brown laying hen parent-stock flocks and their relationships with production parameters. de Haas EN, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE, Groothuis T, Rodenburg TB. Poult Sci; 2013 Sep 01; 92(9):2259-69. PubMed ID: 23960107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]