These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 35260254

  • 1. Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations.
    Cameron AB, Evans JL, Abuzar MA, Tadakamadla SK, Love RM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 35260254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Hwang HJ, Lee SJ, Park EJ, Yoon HI.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing.
    Jin MC, Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Kim SH, Han JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 31227240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
    Song S, Zhang J, Liu M, Li F, Bai S.
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intaglio surface of CNC milled versus 3D printed maxillary complete denture bases - An in vitro investigation of the accuracy of seven systems.
    Cameron AB, Kim H, Evans JL, Abuzar MA, Tadakamadla SK, Alifui-Segbaya F.
    J Dent; 2024 Dec; 151():105389. PubMed ID: 39393605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L, Guida L, Zhurakivska K, Troiano G, Chochlidakis K, Ercoli C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study.
    Faur AB, Rotar RN, Jivănescu A.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun 08; 24(1):671. PubMed ID: 38851680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases?
    Wemken G, Spies BC, Pieralli S, Adali U, Beuer F, Wesemann C.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov 08; 111():103975. PubMed ID: 32781402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer.
    Gao H, Yang Z, Lin WS, Tan J, Chen L.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct 08; 30(8):684-689. PubMed ID: 33459450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Yoon HI, Hwang HJ, Ohkubo C, Han JS, Park EJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec 08; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Trueness of artificial teeth for CAD-CAM complete dentures fabricated with additive manufacturing implementing different denture base-tooth offset values: An in vitro study.
    Neena AF, Abd-Ellah ME.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 08; 131(4):705.e1-705.e7. PubMed ID: 38262840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
    Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr 08; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
    Yoshidome K, Torii M, Kawamura N, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct 15; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
    Alfaraj A, Yang CC, Levon JA, Chu TG, Morton D, Lin WS.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar 15; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base: An in vitro study.
    You SM, You SG, Lee BI, Kim JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan 15; 127(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 33239193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of print orientation and wet-dry storage time on the intaglio accuracy of additively manufactured occlusal devices.
    Revilla-León M, Cascos-Sánchez R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun 15; 131(6):1226-1234. PubMed ID: 36635137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of build orientation and bar addition on accuracy of complete denture base fabricated with digital light projection: An in vitro study.
    Chaiamornsup P, Katheng A, Ha R, Tsuchida Y, Kanazawa M, Uo M, Minakuchi S, Suzuki T, Takahashi H.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Oct 13; 67(4):641-646. PubMed ID: 37032072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Tosun ON, Bilmenoglu C, Özdemir AK.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar 13; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of trueness and precision of stereolithography-fabricated photopolymer-resin dentures under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study.
    Katheng A, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Hada T, Minakuchi S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep 13; 128(3):514-520. PubMed ID: 33583615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.