These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 35266798

  • 21. International normalised ratio (INR) measured on the CoaguChek S and XS compared with the laboratory for determination of precision and accuracy.
    Christensen TD, Larsen TB, Jensen C, Maegaard M, Sørensen B.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Mar; 101(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 19277421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison between CoaguChek S- and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
    Jonsson M, Hillarp A, Svensson P.
    Thromb Res; 2004 Mar; 114(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15306149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Warfarin monitoring and interference by lupus anticoagulant in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
    Jepsen SY, Larsen JB, Christensen TD, Grove EL, Maegaard M, Hvas AM.
    Thromb Res; 2022 Mar; 211():127-132. PubMed ID: 35149398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effects of home prothrombin international ratio (PT-INR) management in children with mechanical prosthetic valves - Importance of individual correlations between laboratory and CoaguChek device PT-INRs.
    Ino N, Masutani S, Tanikawa S, Iwamoto Y, Saiki H, Ishido H, Tamura M, Senzaki H.
    J Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 71(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 29066099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
    Braun S, Watzke H, Hasenkam JM, Schwab M, Wolf T, Dovifat C, Völler H.
    Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A comparative study using thrombin generation and three different INR methods in patients on Vitamin K antagonist treatment.
    Riva N, Vella K, Meli S, Hickey K, Zammit D, Calamatta C, Makris M, Kitchen S, Ageno W, Gatt A.
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Oct; 39(5):482-488. PubMed ID: 28500649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Performance of the microINR Point-of-Care System: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.
    Refaai MA, Shah V, Fernando R.
    Thromb Haemost; 2020 Apr; 120(4):687-691. PubMed ID: 32299116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers.
    Karon BS, McBane RD, Chaudhry R, Beyer LK, Santrach PJ.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jul; 130(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18550476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Prospective Comparison of Point-of-Care Device and Standard Analyzer for Monitoring of International Normalized Ratio in Outpatient Oral Anticoagulant Clinic.
    Moiz B, Rashid A, Hasan M, Jafri L, Raheem A.
    Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2018 Oct; 24(7):1153-1158. PubMed ID: 29374969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A Comparative Study of Point-of-Care Prothrombin Time in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.
    Okabayashi S, Ogawa S, Tanaka KA, Nishiyama T, Takeshita S, Nakayama Y, Nakajima Y, Sawa T, Mizobe T.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Aug; 32(4):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 29395816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Agreement between Coaguchek XS and STA-R Evolution (Hepato Quick) INR results depends on the level of INR.
    Biedermann JS, Leebeek FW, Buhre PN, de Lathouder S, Barends JP, de Maat MP, van der Meer FJ, Kruip MJ.
    Thromb Res; 2015 Sep; 136(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 26164396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients.
    Lawrie AS, Hills J, Longair I, Green L, Gardiner C, Machin SJ, Cohen H.
    Thromb Res; 2012 Jul; 130(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 21937093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.