These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 35283321

  • 1. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
    Chill HH, Cohen-Milun G, Cohen A, Moss NP, Winer JD, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pollack BL, Popiel P, Toaff MC, Drugge E, Bielawski A, Sacks A, Bibi M, Friedman-Ciment R, LeBron K, Alishahian L, Phillips D, Rubino SR, Pollack S, Khan RS, Khan ES, Pape DM, Grimes CL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb 01; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan 01; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
    Chill HH, Navon I, Reuveni-Salzman A, Cohen A, Dick A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct 01; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair.
    Barba M, Cola A, Melocchi T, De Vicari D, Costa C, Volontè S, Sandullo L, Frigerio M.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb 13; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Rogers RG, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Paraiso MFR, Mazloomdoost D, Grey S, Sridhar A, Wallace D, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    JAMA; 2019 Sep 17; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
    Rappa C, Saccone G.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov 17; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Van Eijndhoven HW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 17; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Infected pelvic hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.
    Chill HH, Ben Porat L, Winer J, Moss NP, Cohen A, Shveiky D.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr 17; 271():97-101. PubMed ID: 35180514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
    BMJ; 2019 Sep 10; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcomes of uterosacral ligaments suspension for uterovaginal prolapse native-tissue repair: Over 1000-patient single-center study.
    Barba M, Cola A, Costa C, De Vicari D, Amatucci N, Melocchi T, Frigerio M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Oct 10; 301():206-209. PubMed ID: 39154516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Komesu Y, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Paraiso MFR, Mazloomdoost D, Sridhar A, Thomas S, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug 10; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Permanent or absorbable suture material for sacrospinous ligament fixation: Does it matter?
    Padoa A, Ziv Y, Tsviban A, Tomashev R, Smorgick N, Fligelman T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Apr 10; 283():112-117. PubMed ID: 36827752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Is absorbable suture superior to permanent suture for uterosacral ligament suspension?
    Peng L, Liu YH, He SX, Di XP, Shen H, Luo DY.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Sep 10; 39(7):1958-1965. PubMed ID: 32658368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.