These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 35351284

  • 1. Comparison of Invasive Coronary Angiography Versus Computed Tomography Angiography to Assess Mehran Classification of In-Stent Restenosis in Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Naeem H, Khan U, Mohsin M, Niazi K, Malik J, Satti DI, Anwar W.
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Jun 01; 172():11-17. PubMed ID: 35351284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Angiography to Assess Medina Classification in Coronary Bifurcations.
    Grodecki K, Opolski MP, Staruch AD, Michalowska AM, Kepka C, Wolny R, Pregowski J, Kruk M, Debski M, Debski A, Michalowska I, Witkowski A.
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 May 15; 125(10):1479-1485. PubMed ID: 32276762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography.
    Pan J, Lu Z, Zhang J, Li M, Wei M.
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan 15; 23(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22772148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.
    Wan YL, Tsay PK, Chen CC, Juan YH, Huang YC, Chan WH, Wen MS, Hsieh IC.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun 15; 32 Suppl 1():105-15. PubMed ID: 27106698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
    Dai T, Wang JR, Hu PF.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr 15; 28(4):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 29124384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis.
    Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Vliegenthart R, Duguay TM, Stubenrauch AC, Rosenberg RD, Varga-Szemes A, Bayer RR, Yang J, Ebersberger U, Baquet M, Jochheim D, Hoffmann E, Steinberg DH, Chiaramida SA, Schoepf UJ.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016 Apr 15; 10(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 27431607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using third-generation dual-source CT for ruling out in-stent restenosis.
    Eckert J, Renczes-Janetzko P, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtländer T, Schmermund A.
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Apr 15; 108(4):402-410. PubMed ID: 30187179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The utility and effectiveness of the newer generation high-resolution coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis.
    Elwany MN, Abskharoun M, Dawood M, Al-Tahan SM, Sanhoury M.
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Feb 15; 49(2):102212. PubMed ID: 37993007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
    de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, Boogers MJ, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Reiber JH, Sieders A, Spanó F, Jukema JW, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun 15; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The usefulness of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography for in-stent restenosis assessment of patients with CoCr stent using 320-row area detector CT.
    Li J, Guo MT, Yang X, Gao F, Li N, Huang MG.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec 23; 100(51):e28345. PubMed ID: 34941141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression.
    Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Collet C, Sonck J, D'Errico A, Di Odoardo L, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Trabattoni D, Ravagnani P, Montorsi P, Teruzzi G, Olivares P, Fabbiocchi F, De Martini S, Calligaris G, Annoni A, Mancini ME, Formenti A, Magatelli M, Consiglio E, Muscogiuri G, Lombardi F, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar 23; 13(3):732-742. PubMed ID: 31422127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Coronary computed tomography angiographic detection of in-stent restenosis via deep learning reconstruction: a feasibility study.
    Kawai H, Motoyama S, Sarai M, Sato Y, Matsuyama T, Matsumoto R, Takahashi H, Katagata A, Kataoka Y, Ida Y, Muramatsu T, Ohno Y, Ozaki Y, Toyama H, Narula J, Izawa H.
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr 23; 34(4):2647-2657. PubMed ID: 37672056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1-year interval: findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Xu N, Zhang J, Li M, Pan J, Lu Z.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct 23; 83(10):1816-21. PubMed ID: 25112673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prediction value of pericoronary fat attenuation index for coronary in-stent restenosis.
    Lu ZF, Yin WH, Schoepf UJ, Abrol S, Ma JW, Zhao L, Su XM, An YQ, Xiao ZC, Lu B.
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug 23; 34(8):4950-4959. PubMed ID: 38224375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Lee YJ, Lim YS, Lim HW, Yoo WJ, Choi BG, Kim BS.
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct 23; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Diagnostic value of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis].
    Wang J, Chen XM, Wang SH, Ye HH, Cui HB, Du WP, Zhou HL, Feng MJ, Pan YN, Lin SY.
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Jun 23; 40(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 22943643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: value of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Amanuma M, Kondo T, Sano T, Takayanagi T, Matsutani H, Sekine T, Arai T, Morita H, Ishizaka K, Arakita K, Iwasa A, Takase S.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr 23; 32(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 26662268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study.
    Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Sonck J, Collet C, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Trabattoni D, Galli S, Montorsi P, Ferrari C, Fabbiocchi F, De Martini S, Annoni A, Mancini ME, Formenti A, Magatelli M, Resta M, Consiglio E, Muscogiuri G, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018 Apr 23; 12(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 29933938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
    Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F, Martus P, Stangl K, Greupner J, Knebel F, Kranz A, Schlattmann P, Laule M, Dewey M.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct 15; 62(16):1476-85. PubMed ID: 23792193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography.
    Zhao J, Zheng LL, Yang Y.
    Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec 15; 22(8):540-52. PubMed ID: 21959714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.