These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 3536340

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography.
    Bray BE, Anderson FL, Hardin CW, Kruger RA, Sutton RB, Nelson JA.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Digital angiography in the pediatric patient with congenital heart disease: comparison with standard methods.
    Levin AR, Goldberg HL, Borer JS, Rothenberg LN, Nolan FA, Engle MA, Cohen B, Skelly NT, Carter J.
    Circulation; 1983 Aug; 68(2):374-84. PubMed ID: 6345022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Correlation of 10-milliliter digital subtraction ventriculograms compared with standard cineangiograms.
    Tobis JM, Nalcioglu O, Johnston WD, Seibert A, Roeck W, Iseri LT, Elkayam U, Henry WL.
    Am Heart J; 1983 Jun; 105(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 6344605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Comparisons of images simultaneously documented by digital subtraction coronary arteriography and cine coronary arteriography].
    Kimura K, Takamiya M, Yamamoto K, Ohta M, Naito H.
    J Cardiol; 1988 Dec; 18(4):889-97. PubMed ID: 3267727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Use of personal computers and digitized film angiograms to produce subtraction angiograms.
    Kofler JM, Gray JE, Cesar LJ.
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):401-7. PubMed ID: 8966296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Evaluation of coronary blood flow using digital subtraction technique and cine coronary angiography: a preliminary report].
    Uwatoko M, Miyagi Y, Nomura M, Shiga Y, Koike A, Tateishi R, Mitsuguchi F, Mano K, Hishida H, Mizuno Y.
    J Cardiol; 1988 Jun; 18(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 2977791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital angiography: current status.
    Robillard P, Roy P, Galand C, Sylvestre J.
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6350311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intravenous arteriography using digital subtraction techniques.
    Brody WR, Enzmann DR, Miller DC, Guthaner DF, Pelc NJ, Keyes GS, Riederer SJ.
    JAMA; 1982 Aug 13; 248(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7047776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Generation of a subtraction mask for digital angiography based on the movement of the coronary arteries.
    Haaker P, Klotz E, Koppe R, Linde R.
    Eur Heart J; 1987 Jan 13; 8(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 3816839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in brain ischemia.
    Little JR, Furlan AJ, Modic MT, Bryerton B, Weinstein MA.
    JAMA; 1982 Jun 18; 247(23):3213. PubMed ID: 7045414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computer processed fluoroscopic images for digital intravenous renal angiography.
    Strauss LG, Busch HP, Prager P, Hartmann H, Müller W, Clorius JH, Lorenz WJ, Georgi M.
    Eur J Radiol; 1986 Feb 18; 6(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 3516702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography.
    Gurley JC, Nissen SE.
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990 Feb 18; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.