These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 35400278

  • 1. Application of the extended technology acceptance model to explore clinician likelihood to use robotics in rehabilitation.
    Klaic M, Fong J, Crocher V, Davies K, Brock K, Sutton E, Oetomo D, Tan Y, Galea MP.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jan; 19(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 35400278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rehabilitation robotics for the upper extremity: review with new directions for orthopaedic disorders.
    Hakim RM, Tunis BG, Ross MD.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):765-771. PubMed ID: 28035841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Robot-assisted training compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme and with usual care for upper limb functional limitation after stroke: the RATULS three-group RCT.
    Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N, Finch T, Alvarado N, Ternent L, Fernandez-Garcia C, Aird L, Andole S, Cohen DL, Dawson J, Ford GA, Francis R, Hogg S, Hughes N, Price CI, Turner DL, Vale L, Wilkes S, Shaw L.
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Oct; 24(54):1-232. PubMed ID: 33140719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
    Colombo R, Pisano F, Delconte C, Mazzone A, Grioni G, Castagna M, Bazzini G, Imarisio C, Maggioni G, Pistarini C.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Promoting clinical best practice in a user-centred design study of an upper limb rehabilitation robot.
    Fong J, Crocher V, Klaic M, Davies K, Rowse A, Sutton E, Tan Y, Oetomo D, Brock K, Galea MP.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Jul; 17(5):531-538. PubMed ID: 32608290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
    Daly JJ, Ruff RL.
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec 20; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of robotic assisted rehabilitation for mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: a systematic review.
    Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C.
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2017 Dec 20; 15(12):3049-3091. PubMed ID: 29219877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
    Jakob I, Kollreider A, Germanotta M, Benetti F, Cruciani A, Padua L, Aprile I.
    PM R; 2018 Sep 20; 10(9 Suppl 2):S189-S197. PubMed ID: 30269805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective.
    Bishop L, Stein J.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013 Sep 20; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Robotic assistive and rehabilitation devices leading to motor recovery in upper limb: a systematic review.
    Khalid S, Alnajjar F, Gochoo M, Renawi A, Shimoda S.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Jul 20; 18(5):658-672. PubMed ID: 33861684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Systematic review of guidelines to identify recommendations for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke.
    Morone G, Palomba A, Martino Cinnera A, Agostini M, Aprile I, Arienti C, Paci M, Casanova E, Marino D, LA Rosa G, Bressi F, Sterzi S, Gandolfi M, Giansanti D, Perrero L, Battistini A, Miccinilli S, Filoni S, Sicari M, Petrozzino S, Solaro CM, Gargano S, Benanti P, Boldrini P, Bonaiuti D, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Mazzoleni S, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Posteraro F, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Straudi S, "CICERONE" Italian Consensus Conference on Robotic in Neurorehabilitation.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Apr 20; 57(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 33491943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, Armani M.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb 20; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Does assist-as-needed upper limb robotic therapy promote participation in repetitive activity-based motor training in sub-acute stroke patients with severe paresis?
    Grosmaire AG, Duret C.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017 Feb 20; 41(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 28527224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Enhancing stroke rehabilitation with whole-hand haptic rendering: development and clinical usability evaluation of a novel upper-limb rehabilitation device.
    Rätz R, Conti F, Thaler I, Müri RM, Marchal-Crespo L.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 Sep 27; 21(1):172. PubMed ID: 39334423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting.
    Sivan M, Gallagher J, Makower S, Keeling D, Bhakta B, O'Connor RJ, Levesley M.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Dec 12; 11():163. PubMed ID: 25495889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial.
    Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Reiss A, Buchanan S, Sahu K, Bay CR, Wolf SL, Alberts JL.
    Int J Stroke; 2013 Jan 12; 8(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 23280269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System.
    Adomavičienė A, Daunoravičienė K, Kubilius R, Varžaitytė L, Raistenskis J.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr 09; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30970655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
    Germanotta M, Cruciani A, Pecchioli C, Loreti S, Spedicato A, Meotti M, Mosca R, Speranza G, Cecchi F, Giannarelli G, Padua L, Aprile I.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May 16; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke.
    Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug 24; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 32831097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
    Washabaugh EP, Treadway E, Gillespie RB, Remy CD, Krishnan C.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018 Aug 24; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.