These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 35405013

  • 1. The Influence of Cement Removal Techniques on In Situ Bacterial Adhesion and Biodegradation at the Marginal Interface of Ceramic Laminates.
    de Brito O, Sandes JM, de Lima F, Oliveira JB, Alves LC, Brayner FA, de Melo Monteiro GQ.
    Oper Dent; 2022 Mar 01; 47(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 35405013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bacterial Colonization in the Marginal Region of Ceramic Restorations: Effects of Different Cement Removal Methods and Polishing.
    Pereira S, Anami LC, Pereira CA, Souza R, Kantorski KZ, Bottino MA, Jorge A, Valandro LF.
    Oper Dent; 2016 Mar 01; 41(6):642-654. PubMed ID: 27820691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques.
    Anami LC, Pereira CA, Guerra E, Assunção e Souza RO, Jorge AO, Bottino MA.
    J Dent; 2012 Sep 01; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan 01; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
    Braga RR, Condon JR, Ferracane JL.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002 Jan 01; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM, Covey D, Watanabe H, Simetich B, Schulte JR, Chen H.
    J Clin Dent; 2014 Jan 01; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA.
    J Dent; 2000 Jul 01; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA, Meiers JC.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Jul 01; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA, Eskelson E, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, Jorge AO, do Rego MA.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Jul 01; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr 01; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV, Johnson GH, Oswald MT, Tucker RD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr 01; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR, Boston DW.
    J Clin Dent; 2010 Apr 01; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
    Rojpaibool T, Leevailoj C.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb 01; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials.
    Bayrak GD, Sandalli N, Selvi-Kuvvetli S, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Nov 12; 29(6):424-434. PubMed ID: 28618104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB, Biskin T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May 12; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug 12; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Mangelkramer M, Handel G.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Aug 12; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bacterial Adhesion and In Situ Biodegradation of Preheated Resin Composite Used as a Luting Agent for Indirect Restorations.
    Bezerra A, Gonçalves G, Alves LC, Stamfor T, De Brito O, Monteiro G.
    Oper Dent; 2024 Nov 01; 49(6):725-737. PubMed ID: 39420222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Analysis of Surface Roughness, Fracture Toughness, and Weibull Characteristics of Different Framework-Veneer Dental Ceramic Assemblies after Grinding, Polishing, and Glazing.
    Pradíes G, Godoy-Ruiz L, Özcan M, Moreno-Hay I, Martínez-Rus F.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan 01; 28(1):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 29144007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of cement type, excess removal, and polishing on the cement joint.
    Beierlein G, Haas L, Hahnel S, Schmidt M, Rosentritt M.
    Quintessence Int; 2024 Feb 28; 55(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 38108419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.