These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 35448911

  • 1. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J, Jung RE, Han Y, Mei Y, Di P.
    J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Young K, Sicilia E, Cho SH, Kois JC.
    J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study.
    Garikano X, Amezua X, Iturrate M, Solaberrieta E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):709-717. PubMed ID: 36115710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):964-972. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M, Piedra-Cascón W, Methani MM, Quesada-Olmo N, Farjas-Abadia M, Revilla-León M.
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based program for locating the maxillomandibular relationship of scans acquired by using intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar 07. PubMed ID: 38458860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 18. PubMed ID: 38641478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H, Liu X, Liu M, Yang X, Tan J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 18; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M, Cascos R, Ortega R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Revilla-León M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun 18; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records.
    Li J, Chen Z, Decker AM, Wang HL, Joda T, Mendonca G, Lepidi L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan 18; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y, Chen JK, Deng KH, Wang Y, Sun YC, Zhao YJ.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb 18; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.