These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
298 related items for PubMed ID: 3550033
1. The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus. A human surgical evaluation. Gellin RG, Miller MC, Javed T, Engler WO, Mishkin DJ. J Periodontol; 1986 Nov; 57(11):672-80. PubMed ID: 3550033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal. Rabbani GM, Ash MM, Caffesse RG. J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 7014822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. Breininger DR, O'Leary TJ, Blumenshine RV. J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing. Hunter RK, O'Leary TJ, Kafrawy AH. J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one? Drisko CH. Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study. Silva D, Martins O, Matos S, Lopes P, Rolo T, Baptista I. Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Calculus removal by scaling/root planing with and without surgical access. Buchanan SA, Robertson PB. J Periodontol; 1987 Mar; 58(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 3550036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculus removal from multirooted teeth with and without surgical access. (I). Efficacy on external and furcation surfaces in relation to probing depth. Parashis AO, Anagnou-Vareltzides A, Demetriou N. J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 20(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 8421119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations. Patterson M, Eick JD, Eberhart AB, Gross K, Killoy WJ. J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets. Nagy RJ, Otomo-Corgel J, Stambaugh R. J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing. II. Clinical responses related to residual calculus. Sherman PR, Hutchens LH, Jewson LG. J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 2179516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Tartar removal by hand instruments and by ultrasonic apparatus. Current approaches and recent findings]. Picarelli A, Alessio R, Fossato L. Minerva Stomatol; 1984 Nov; 33(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 6394984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips. Yukna RA, Scott JB, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, LeBlanc DM, Mayer ET. J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]