These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 35604586

  • 1. Comparison of Fenton, INTERGROWTH-21st, and Population-Based Growth Charts in Predicting Outcomes of Very Preterm Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates.
    Anne RP, Vardhelli V, Murki S, Deshabhotla SK, Oleti TP.
    Indian J Pediatr; 2022 Oct; 89(10):1034-1036. PubMed ID: 35604586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21 and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants.
    Tuzun F, Yucesoy E, Baysal B, Kumral A, Duman N, Ozkan H.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(17):2252-2257. PubMed ID: 28587527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of regional versus global growth charts for the classification of small-for-gestational age neonates.
    Anand P, Thomas D, Agarwal R, Thukral A, Deorari AK, Paul VK, Sankar MJ.
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2023 Jan; 108(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 35551076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differences When Classifying Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants According to the Growth Chart Applied.
    Estañ-Capell J, Alarcón-Torres B, Miró-Pedro M, Martínez-Costa C.
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1212-e1219. PubMed ID: 36709759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Extrauterine growth restriction in extremely preterm infants based on the Intergrowth-21st Project Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study growth charts and the Fenton growth charts.
    Kim YJ, Shin SH, Cho H, Shin SH, Kim SH, Song IG, Kim EK, Kim HS.
    Eur J Pediatr; 2021 Mar; 180(3):817-824. PubMed ID: 32909099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL, Hiscock RJ, Lockie E, Permezel M, McGauren MFG, Kennedy AL, Green B, Walker SP, Lindquist AC.
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Fenton 2013 growth curves and Intergrowth-21 growth standards to assess the incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and extrauterine growth restriction in preterm neonates ≤32 weeks.
    Reddy KV, Sharma D, Vardhelli V, Bashir T, Deshbotla SK, Murki S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Aug; 34(16):2634-2641. PubMed ID: 31656092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY, Gordon A, Hilder L, Henry A, Hyett JA, Brew BK, Joseph F, Jorm L, Chambers GM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative study between Fenton and intergrowth 21 charts in a sample of Lebanese premature babies.
    Samarani M, Restom G, Mardini J, Abi Fares G, Hallit S, Fadous Khalife MC.
    BMC Pediatr; 2020 Feb 17; 20(1):74. PubMed ID: 32066413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Is the Intrauterine INTERGROWTH-21 Growth Curve Better Than Fenton's for the Classification at Birth and Prediction of Postnatal Growth in Preterm Infants?
    Lebrão CW, Suano-Souza FI, Sarni ROS.
    Matern Child Health J; 2020 Dec 17; 24(12):1446-1453. PubMed ID: 32740751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
    Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, Leavitt K, Tuuli M, Odibo AO.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun 17; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
    Cheng Y, Leung TY, Lao T, Chan YM, Sahota DS.
    BJOG; 2016 Sep 17; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Predictive ability of postnatal growth failure for adverse feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants: an exploratory study comparing Fenton with INTERGROWTH-21st preterm growth charts.
    Viswanathan S, Osborn E, Jadcherla S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec 17; 35(25):5470-5477. PubMed ID: 33573451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21st standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term.
    Francis A, Hugh O, Gardosi J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 17; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21st birthweight standards to identify small for gestational age associated perinatal outcomes at term.
    Fay E, Hugh O, Francis A, Katz R, Sitcov K, Souter V, Gardosi J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar 17; 4(2):100545. PubMed ID: 34875415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population.
    Kajdy A, Modzelewski J, Filipecka-Tyczka D, Pokropek A, Rabijewski M.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep 17; 34(18):2977-2984. PubMed ID: 31619090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. INCIDENCE OF SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE NEONATES, ACCORDING TO THE FENTON AND INTERGROWTH-21ST CURVES IN A LEVEL II MATERNITY.
    Barreto CM, Pereira MAL, Rolim ACB, Abbas SA, Langhi Junior DM, Santos AMND.
    Rev Paul Pediatr; 2021 Sep 17; 39():e2019245. PubMed ID: 32638944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.