These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 3562829

  • 1. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L, Day JL, Villafana T, Miller CH, Lightfoot DA.
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
    Kimme-Smith CM, Sayre JW, McCombs MM, DeBruhl ND, Bassett LW.
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K, Zuguchi M, Sai M, Saito H, Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Ito D, Kimoto N, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S.
    Clin Imaging; 2005 Nov; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR, Thilander AK, Sandborg M, Skinner CL, Castellano IA, Carlsson GA.
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL, Wu X, Barnes GT.
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ.
    Med Phys; 1985 Jun; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
    Beaman S, Lillicrap SC, Price JL.
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography.
    Nishino TK, Wu X, Johnson RF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):960-3. PubMed ID: 16177415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.