These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 35656686

  • 1. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
    Kalla K, Arunachalam S, Behera SSP, Konchada J, Lankapalli S, Vanisetti L.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec 01; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug 01; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec 01; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec 01; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec 01; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb 01; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
    Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, Steiner M, Kern M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Feb 01; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct 01; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, Pinés-Hueso J, deLlanos-Lanchares H, del Rio Highsmith J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016 Oct 01; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Oct 01; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Limkangwalmongkol P, Romberg E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C, Harder S, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec 01; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, Khare S.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec 01; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB, Cakan U, Canay S.
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct 01; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV, Freitas MA, de Morais Alves da Cunha T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr 01; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr 01; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb 01; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
    Müller L, Rauch A, Reissmann DR, Schierz O.
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov 19; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P, Bleuel K, Fischer C, Sader R.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun 14; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R, Rappelli G, Camaioni E, Cattani M, Meyer JM, Belser UC.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb 14; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.