These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


188 related items for PubMed ID: 35679127

  • 1. Within-patient evaluation of chewing efficiency and maximum bite force of conventional dentures, fixed prostheses, and milled bar overdentures used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridges: A short-term randomized trial.
    ELsyad MA, Tella EAES, Mohamed SS, Mahrous AI.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):522-531. PubMed ID: 35679127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: A within-subject study.
    ELsyad MA, El-Asfahani IA, Kortam SA, Mourad SI.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 33604996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chewing efficiency and maximum bite force with different attachment systems of implant overdentures: a crossover study.
    Elsyad MA, Khairallah AS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):677-682. PubMed ID: 27118683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with Different Retentive Attachments for Implant Overdentures in Patients with Atrophied Mandibular Ridges: A Crossover Study.
    ElSyad MA, Ibrahim AE, Nawar NHH, Belal TM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Jun; 34(5):1213–1222. PubMed ID: 30892293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study.
    Nabil MS, Mahanna FF, Said MM.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun 08; 24(1):672. PubMed ID: 38851676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Changes in masticatory performance and bite force after treatment with mandibular overdentures retained by four titanium-zirconium mini implants: One-year randomised clinical trial.
    Leles CR, Curado TFF, Nascimento LN, Silva JR, de Paula MS, McKenna G, Schimmel M.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Aug 08; 51(8):1459-1467. PubMed ID: 38685704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
    Kumar A, Karthik KVGC, Sunkala L, Bejagam V, Rathore KK, Rai P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May 01; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 May 01; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
    Salami ZA, Jasser EM, Makzoumé JED, Boulos PJA.
    Gen Dent; 2020 May 01; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Four-implant-supported fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdentures for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical and radiographic study.
    ElSyad MA, Alameldeen HE, Elsaih EA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 May 01; 34(6):1493–1503. PubMed ID: 31184639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: An in vivo study.
    Sharma AJ, Nagrath R, Lahori M.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017 May 01; 17(4):361-372. PubMed ID: 29249880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation. A crossover study.
    ELsyad MA, Elgamal M, Mohammed Askar O, Youssef Al-Tonbary G.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov 01; 30(11):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 31410893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
    Elsyad MA, Hegazy SA, Hammouda NI, Al-Tonbary GY, Habib AA.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun 01; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
    Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Mostajeran Z, Fazel A, Eshkevari Ps.
    J Oral Implantol; 2009 Jun 01; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
    Tang L, Lund JP, Taché R, Clokie CM, Feine JS.
    J Dent Res; 1999 Sep 01; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prosthetic complications and maintenance of different attachments used to stabilize mandibular 2-implant overdentures in patients with atrophied ridges. A 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    ELsyad MA, Abdraboh AE, Denewar MM, Mohamed SS.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug 01; 24(4):497-509. PubMed ID: 35466498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
    Amaral CF, Pinheiro MA, de Moraes M, Rodrigues Garcia RCM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018 Aug 01; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes.
    de Albuquerque Júnior RF, Lund JP, Tang L, Larivée J, de Grandmont P, Gauthier G, Feine JS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Dec 01; 11(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 11168249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
    Uçankale M, Akoğlu B, Ozkan Y, Ozkan YK.
    Gerodontology; 2012 Mar 01; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A 1-year prospective cohort study on mandibular overdentures retained by mini dental implants.
    Scepanovic M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Markovic A, Delgardo-Ruiz R, Todorovic A, Milicic B, Misic T.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012 Mar 01; 5(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 23304690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.