These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 35703140

  • 1. A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Holder C, Stoney J, Graves SE, Bingham R.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Aug 17; 104(16):1462-1474. PubMed ID: 35703140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Dyer C, Graves SE, Bingham R.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun 01; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W, Bingham R, Dyer C, Rainbird S, Graves SE.
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep 01; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Rainbird S, Kelly TL, Hatton A.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov 01; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
    Hoskins W, Griffin X, Hatton A, de Steiger RN, Bingham R.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan 01; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
    Bauze A, Agrawal S, Cuthbert A, de Steiger R.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun 01; 477(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 31136427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
    Cafri G, Paxton EW, Love R, Bini SA, Kurtz SM.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May 01; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
    van Steenbergen LN, de Reus IM, Hannink G, Vehmeijer SB, Schreurs BW, Zijlstra WP.
    Hip Int; 2023 Nov 01; 33(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 36935558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN, Hatton A, Peng Y, Graves S.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun 01; 478(6):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 32345846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study.
    Tsikandylakis G, Kärrholm J, Hailer NP, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä KT, Hallan G, Furnes ON, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S, Mohaddes M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec 01; 476(12):2367-2378. PubMed ID: 30260863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Standard, Large-Head, Dual-Mobility, or Constrained-Liner Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for a Diagnosis of Dislocation: An Analysis of 1,275 Revision Total Hip Replacements.
    Hoskins W, Bingham R, Hatton A, de Steiger RN.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Dec 02; 102(23):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 33264216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection?
    Theil C, Schwarze J, Smolle MA, Pützler J, Moellenbeck B, Schneider KN, Schulze M, Klingebiel S, Gosheger G.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep 01; 481(9):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 36897193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Risk factors for revision surgery due to dislocation within 1 year after 111,711 primary total hip arthroplasties from 2005 to 2019: a study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Thoen PS, Lygre SHL, Nordsletten L, Furnes O, Stigum H, Hallan G, Röhrl SM.
    Acta Orthop; 2022 Jun 24; 93():593-601. PubMed ID: 35770369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
    Hernigou P, Tannyeres P, Barbier O, Chenaie P.
    Int Orthop; 2023 Aug 24; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN, Lewis PL, Harris I, Lorimer MF, Graves SE.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct 01; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Agarwal S, Eckhard L, Walter WL, Peng A, Hatton A, Donnelly B, de Steiger R.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Oct 20; 103(20):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 34143758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture.
    Rogmark C, Nåtman J, Jobory A, Hailer NP, Cnudde P.
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul 20; 104-B(7):844-851. PubMed ID: 35775180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Gregg PJ, Brewster N, Deehan DJ, Reed MR.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec 20; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
    Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb 20; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Following total hip arthroplasty: femoral head component diameter of 32 mm or larger is associated with lower risk of dislocation in patients with a prior lumbar fusion.
    Mononen H, Sund R, Halme J, Kröger H, Sirola J.
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug 20; 102-B(8):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 32731818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.