These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
142 related items for PubMed ID: 3570419
1. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry. Pettersson F, Näslund I, Malker B. IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparén P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, Dillner J, Törnberg S. J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May 07; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment. Gunnell AS, Ylitalo N, Sandin S, Sparén P, Adami HO, Ripatti S. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec 07; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden. Andersson-Ellström A, Seidal T, Grannas M, Hagmar B. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar 07; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening. Mitchell H, Hocking J, Saville M. Cancer; 2003 Dec 25; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening]. Thoresen SO, Skare GB, Sandvin O. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug 10; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982. Lynge E, Poll P. IARC Sci Publ; 1986 Aug 10; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer. Stuart GC, McGregor SE, Duggan MA, Nation JG. CMAJ; 1997 Sep 01; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage. Lewis H, Yeh LC, Almendral B, Neal H. N Z Med J; 2009 Oct 30; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 1991 cervical screening recommendations: a working group report. Paul C, Bagshaw S, Bonita R, Durham G, Fitzgerald NW, Jones RW, Marshall B, McAvoy BR. N Z Med J; 1991 Jul 10; 104(915):291-5. PubMed ID: 1906587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Gynecological screening in Sweden. Report of results and comparison with the cancer registry]. Ericsson J, MattssonB, Pettersson F. Lakartidningen; 1975 Nov 26; 72(48):4719-24. PubMed ID: 1195913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia. Schindeler S, Morrell S, Zuo Y, Baker D. J Med Screen; 2008 Nov 26; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical mass screening in Norway--510,000 smears a year. Bjørge T, Gunbjørud AB, Langmark F, Skare GB, Thoresen SO. Cancer Detect Prev; 1994 Nov 26; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7867019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Previous cytology in patients with carcinoma of the cervix]. Hando T, Sugimori H, Higashiiwai H, Kuroshima Y, Nishiya I, Sugimoto O. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Oct 26; 38(10):1692-6. PubMed ID: 3782952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]