These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 3570786

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The Dosage and Quality of Imaging program and quality assurance in mammography].
    Rimondi O, Gambaccini M, Marziani M, Candini GC, Indovina PL, Toti A, De Guglielmo E, Calicchia A.
    Radiol Med; 1991; 81(1-2):69-72. PubMed ID: 2006340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [A program devoted to dose and quality in mammography (DQM)].
    Rimondi O, Gambaccini M, Indovina P, Candini G.
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 3704212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR.
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Dance DR.
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mammography in New Zealand: radiation dose and image quality.
    Poletti JL, Williamson BD, Mitchell AW.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Jun; 14(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1747087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker DM.
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
    McParland BJ, Boyd MM.
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K, Zuguchi M, Sai M, Saito H, Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Ito D, Kimoto N, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S.
    Clin Imaging; 2005 Jul; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.