These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 3570786

  • 21. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM.
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F, Rosselli Del Turco M, Maggi E, Certo N, Morrone D, Lazzeri B.
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography.
    McParland BJ.
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1068-77. PubMed ID: 11271899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R, Herdade SB, Costa PR, Terini RA, Levenhagen RS.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr 21; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep 21; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE, Yagan R, Oravec D, Shah Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec 21; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Physics, dosimetry, and quality control in mammography].
    Scielzo G, Maggi S.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Nov 21; 86(5):687-94. PubMed ID: 8272556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
    Brandan ME, Ruiz-Trejo C, Verdejo-Silva M, Guevara M, Lozano-Zalce H, Madero-Preciado L, Martín J, Noel-Etienne LM, Ramírez-Arias JL, Soto J, Villaseñor Y.
    Arch Med Res; 2004 Nov 21; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Precision of half-value layer measurement on mammography].
    Ishii R, Yoshida A, Ishii M, Fujimoto S, Henmi N.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Nov 21; 67(12):1533-9. PubMed ID: 22186198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC, Ackerholm PH, Berlin IC, Bjurstam NG, Mattsson SL, Månsson LG, von Schéele C, Thunberg SJ.
    Radiology; 1997 May 21; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Digital mammography: quality and dose control.
    Di Maggio C, Gambaccini M, Gennaro G, Baldelli P, Taibi A, Chersevani R, Aimonetto S, Rossetti V, Origgi D, Vigorito S, Contento G, Angelini L, Maggi S.
    Radiol Med; 2004 May 21; 107(5-6):459-73. PubMed ID: 15195008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics.
    Rojas LJ, Fausto AMF, Mol AW, Velasco FG, Abreu POS, Henriques G, Furquim TAC.
    Phys Med; 2017 Oct 21; 42():13-18. PubMed ID: 29173906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Physicists in mammography--a historical perspective.
    Rothenberg LN, Haus AG.
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov 21; 22(11 Pt 2):1923-34. PubMed ID: 8587546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography.
    Smathers RL, Boone JM, Lee LJ, Berns EA, Miller RA, Wright AM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May 21; 188(5):1414-21. PubMed ID: 17449790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.