These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

497 related items for PubMed ID: 35715320

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Ceci F, Baltzer PAT, Hacker M, Rasul S, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 5(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 35715320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL).
    Wong LM, Sutherland T, Perry E, Tran V, Spelman T, Corcoran N, Lawrentschuk N, Woo H, Lenaghan D, Buchan N, Bax K, Symons J, Saeed Goolam A, Chalasani V, Hegarty J, Thomas L, Christov A, Ng M, Khanani H, Lee SF, Taubman K, Tarlinton L.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Oct; 7(5):1015-1023. PubMed ID: 38281891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
    Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P.
    Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
    Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, de Angelis M, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Cucchiara V, Gandaglia G, Raggi D, Necchi A, Karakiewicz P, Montorsi F, Briganti A.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Beyond Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Emmett L, Papa N, Hope TA, Fendler W, Calais J, Burger I, Eiber M, Barbato F, Moon D, Counter W, John N, Xue A, Franklin A, Thompson J, Rasiah K, Frydenberg M, Yaxley J, Buteau J, Agrawal S, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Woo H, Hsiao E, Sutherland T, Perry E, Stricker P, Hofman MS, Kasivisvanathan V, Roberts M, Murphy D.
    J Urol; 2024 Aug; 212(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 38758680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Combined Utility of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Prostate Biopsy Pathology.
    Kalapara AA, Ballok ZE, Ramdave S, O'Sullivan R, Ryan A, Konety B, Grummet JP, Frydenberg M.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
    Amin A, Blazevski A, Thompson J, Scheltema MJ, Hofman MS, Murphy D, Lawrentschuk N, Sathianathen N, Kapoor J, Woo HH, Chalasani V, Rasiah K, van Leeuwen PJ, Tang R, Cusick T, Stricker P, Emmett L.
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The use of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT to stratify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions according to clinically significant prostate cancer risk.
    Yang J, Tang Y, Zhou C, Zhou M, Li J, Hu S.
    Prostate; 2023 Apr; 83(5):430-439. PubMed ID: 36544382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database.
    Emmett L, Papa N, Counter W, Calais J, Barbato F, Burger I, Eiber M, Roberts MJ, Agrawal S, Franklin A, Xue A, Rasiah K, John N, Moon D, Frydenberg M, Yaxley J, Stricker P, Wong K, Coughlin G, Gianduzzo T, Kua B, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Hsiao E, Sutherland T, Perry E, Fendler WP, Hope TA.
    J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan 02; 65(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 38050155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 68Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study.
    Kubihal V, Sharma S, Kumar R, Seth A, Kumar R, Kaushal S, Sarangi J, Gupta R, Das CJ.
    Indian J Nucl Med; 2021 Jan 02; 36(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 35125753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [18F]DCFPyL PET/MRI compared to multiparametric MRI: a comparison with the histopathology in the radical prostatectomy specimen, the ProStaPET study.
    Bodar YJL, Zwezerijnen BGJC, van der Voorn PJ, Jansen BHE, Smit RS, Kol SQ, Meijer D, de Bie K, Yaqub M, Windhorst BAD, Hendrikse HNH, Vis AN, Oprea-Lager DE.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr 02; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Diagnostic Performance of 68Ga Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Margel D, Bernstine H, Groshar D, Ber Y, Nezrit O, Segal N, Yakimov M, Baniel J, Domachevsky L.
    Radiology; 2021 Nov 02; 301(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 34463555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.