These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
179 related items for PubMed ID: 35715802
1. Analysing root roughness and smear layer relationship by comparing contemporary dental curettes with conventional dental curettes: a randomised controlled trial. Riaz S, Ahmed S, Shabbir S, Khan ZR, Zaidi SJA, Naeem MM, Farooqui WA. BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun 17; 22(1):237. PubMed ID: 35715802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes. Eick S, Bender P, Flury S, Lussi A, Sculean A. Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar 17; 17(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 22526889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, Levi P, Velásquez A, Sanz Moliner J. J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct 17; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the effects of different instrumentation techniques on root surface roughness and cement loss using micro-computerized tomography: An in-vitro study. Karacaoglu F, Orhan K. Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May 17; 20(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 34390126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparative Evaluation of Root Surface Biomodification with Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Gel, and Titanium Nitride Curette: In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscope and Profilometry Analyses. Tunar OL, Gursoy H, Ozkan Karaca E, Kuru BE. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2021 Dec 17; 39(12):766-773. PubMed ID: 34878931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How does the novel piezoelectric 11 Gracey Curette compare to Gracey Curette or piezoelectric scaler? Kumar S. Evid Based Dent; 2022 Sep 17; 23(3):108-109. PubMed ID: 36151284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Diamond burs versus curettes in root planing: a randomized clinical trial. Türktekin F, Buduneli N, Lappin DF, Türk T, Buduneli E. Aust Dent J; 2018 Jun 17; 63(2):242-252. PubMed ID: 29432640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of treatment effect between periodontal subgingival scaling with the special series of ultrasonic inserts and Gracey curette]. Huang Z, Yu XQ, Zhang L, Shang X, Piao MZ. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Sep 17; 47(9):513-7. PubMed ID: 23141722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of manual and ultrasonic instrumentation of cementum surfaces: influence of lateral pressure. Gagnot G, Mora F, Poblete MG, Vachey E, Michel JF, Cathelineau G. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr 17; 24(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15119884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of root surface roughness and bacterial adhesion following treatment with three different instruments. Haroon F, Gregory RL, Hara A, Blanchard SB, Hamada Y. J Periodontol; 2022 May 17; 93(5):e83-e91. PubMed ID: 34338309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]