These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Impact of magnetic fields on calculated AAPM TG-43 parameters for 192Ir and 60Co HDR brachytherapy sources: A Monte Carlo study. Ranjbar S, Gholami S, Longo F, Sharp R, Meigooni AS. Appl Radiat Isot; 2020 May; 159():109088. PubMed ID: 32250763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study. Famulari G, Pater P, Enger SA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jan 01; 100(1):270-277. PubMed ID: 29102279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Microdosimetric spread for cell-sized targets exposed to ⁶⁰Co, ¹⁹²Ir and ¹²⁵I sources. Villegas F, Tilly N, Ahnesjö A. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Sep 01; 166(1-4):365-8. PubMed ID: 25911409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 192 Ir, 169 Yb, and 60 Co high-dose rate brachytherapy sources for skin cancer treatment. Safigholi H, Meigooni AS, Song WY. Med Phys; 2017 Sep 01; 44(9):4426-4436. PubMed ID: 28494095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can intermediate-energy sources lead to elevated bone doses for prostate and head & neck high-dose-rate brachytherapy? Famulari G, Alfieri J, Duclos M, Vuong T, Enger SA. Brachytherapy; 2020 Sep 01; 19(2):255-263. PubMed ID: 31964601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric investigation of LDR brachytherapy ¹⁹²Ir wires by Monte Carlo and TPS calculations. Bozkurt A, Acun H, Kemikler G. Jpn J Radiol; 2013 Jan 01; 31(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23054886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose distribution for endovascular brachytherapy using Ir-192 sources: comparison of Monte Carlo calculations with radiochromic film measurements. Sureka CS, Sunny CS, Subbaiah KV, Aruna P, Ganesan S. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan 21; 52(2):525-37. PubMed ID: 17202631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Approaches to calculating AAPM TG-43 brachytherapy dosimetry parameters for 137Cs, 125I, 192Ir, 103Pd, and 169Yb sources. Melhus CS, Rivard MJ. Med Phys; 2006 Jun 21; 33(6):1729-37. PubMed ID: 16872080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of the AAPM-TG43 dosimetry protocol for I-125 brachytherapy seed. Mobit P, Badragan I. Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul 21; 49(14):3161-70. PubMed ID: 15357189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of the TG-43 formalism for skin high-dose-rate brachytherapy dose calculations. Granero D, Perez-Calatayud J, Vijande J, Ballester F, Rivard MJ. Med Phys; 2014 Feb 21; 41(2):021703. PubMed ID: 24506594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo simulation of the effect of magnetic fields on brachytherapy dose distributions in lung tissue material. Moreno-Barbosa F, de Celis-Alonso B, Moreno-Barbosa E, Hernández-López JM, Geoghegan T, Ramos-Méndez J. PLoS One; 2020 Feb 21; 15(10):e0238704. PubMed ID: 33035214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry of Large Field Valencia applicators for Cobalt-60-based brachytherapy. Píriz GH, Gonzalez-Sprinberg GA, Ballester F, Vijande J. Med Phys; 2024 Jul 21; 51(7):5094-5098. PubMed ID: 38507246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A dosimetric comparison of 169Yb and 192Ir for HDR brachytherapy of the breast, accounting for the effect of finite patient dimensions and tissue inhomogeneities. Lymperopoulou G, Papagiannis P, Angelopoulos A, Karaiskos P, Georgiou E, Baltas D. Med Phys; 2006 Dec 21; 33(12):4583-9. PubMed ID: 17278810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]