These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


311 related items for PubMed ID: 35733275

  • 1. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J, Shi Y, Kong Y, Chen B, Zhang L, Galvin JJ, Li Y, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; ; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
    Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Jensen KK, Goupell MJ.
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J, Wang X, Wang NY, Fu X, Gan T, Galvin JJ, Willis S, Xu K, Thomas M, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug 10; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C, Galvin J, Fu QJ, Legris E, Marx M, Bakhos D.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018 Aug 10; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K, Willis S, Gopen Q, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Aug 10; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW, Goupell MJ, Spencer NJ, Stakhovskaya OA, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Aug 10; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
    Chang YP, Chang RY, Lin CY, Luo X.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Aug 10; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Masked Speech Recognition as a Function of Masker Location for Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Anderson KM, Buss E, Rooth MA, Richter ME, Overton AB, Brown KD, Dillon MT.
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep 10; 31(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 35877957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Oh Y, Hartling CL, Srinivasan NK, Diedesch AC, Gallun FJ, Reiss LAJ.
    Front Neurosci; 2022 Sep 10; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul 10; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB, Liepins R, Kaider A, Vyskocil E, Riss D, Arnoldner C.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jul 10; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD, Corbin NE, Buss E, Monson BB.
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul 10; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.