These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 35752499

  • 1. Comparison of oncological outcomes between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database in Japan.
    Nagano H, Kajitani R, Ohno R, Munechika T, Matsumoto Y, Takahashi H, Aisu N, Kojima D, Yoshimatsu G, Hasegawa S, Kobayashi H, Sugihara K.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 48(12):2467-2474. PubMed ID: 35752499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection, non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
    Hol JC, Burghgraef TA, Rutgers MLW, Crolla RMPH, van Geloven NAW, Leijtens JWA, Polat F, Pronk A, Smits AB, Tuynman JB, Verdaasdonk EGG, Consten ECJ, Hompes R, Sietses C.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 49(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 36460530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.
    Kim JC, Yu CS, Lim SB, Kim CW, Kim JH, Kim TW.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Apr; 28(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23053680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
    Reshef A, Lavery I, Kiran RP.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer.
    Ptok H, Marusch F, Kuhn R, Gastinger I, Lippert H.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 33(7):854-61. PubMed ID: 17933024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of outcomes of abdominoperineal resection vs low anterior resection in very-low rectal cancer.
    Muldoon RL, Bethurum AJ, Gamboa AC, Zhang K, Ye F, Regenbogen SE, Abdel-Misih S, Ejaz A, Wise PE, Silviera M, Holder-Murray J, Balch GC, Hawkins AT.
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Sep; 28(9):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 38897287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of oncologic outcome of abdominoperineal resection versus sphincter saving resection for low lying rectal cancer.
    Jo WI, Lim DR, Kuk JC, Shin EJ.
    Korean J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 36945671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
    Liu P, Bao H, Zhang X, Zhang J, Ma L, Wang Y, Li C, Wang Z, Gong P.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb 12; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Transanal total mesorectal excision for abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients: A word of caution from a multicentric Canadian cohort study.
    Caycedo-Marulanda A, Verschoor CP, Brown CP, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang T, Vikis E, Melich G, Patel SV, Canadian taTME Expert COllaboration (CaTaCO).
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 Apr 12; 24(4):380-387. PubMed ID: 34957663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Putter H, Rutten HJ, Beets GL, Wiggers T, Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ.
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul 12; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Sains PS, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan 12; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Multivariate prognostic analysis of patients with low and middle rectal cancer after curative resection].
    Li CS, Wan DS, Pan ZZ, Zhou ZW, Chen G, Wu XJ, Li LR, Lu ZH, Ding PR, Li Y.
    Ai Zheng; 2006 May 12; 25(5):587-90. PubMed ID: 16687079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative survival risks in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer: a 10-year cohort analysis using propensity score matching.
    Lee HG, Kim CW, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim JC.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May 12; 37(5):989-997. PubMed ID: 35378615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.