These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

317 related items for PubMed ID: 35802387

  • 1. The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
    Cohen IG, Murray M, Gostin LO.
    JAMA; 2022 Jul 26; 328(4):325-326. PubMed ID: 35802387
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
    Drenning MG.
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar 26; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG, Reingold RB, Gostin LO.
    JAMA; 2022 Feb 15; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 May 24; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993 May 24; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The partial death of abortion rights.
    Charo RA.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA.
    Jurist; 1983 May 24; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993 May 24; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Unborn in the USA: what happened and what's next for Roe v Wade and abortion rights?
    Silberner J.
    BMJ; 2022 May 17; 377():o1184. PubMed ID: 35580891
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J.
    Conscience; 1998 May 17; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Abortion rights in the crosshairs: a transnational perspective on resistance strategies.
    Sutton B.
    J Lesbian Stud; 2024 May 17; 28(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 36727605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Abortion: the five-year revolution and its impact.
    Conger J.
    Ecol Law Q; 1973 May 17; 3(2):311-47. PubMed ID: 11663390
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.