These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center. Araújo D, Gromicho A, Dias J, Bastos S, Maciel RM, Sabença A, Xambre L. Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec 20; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A, Dell'Oglio P, De Cobelli F, Esposito A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Brembilla G, Cristel G, Cardone G, Deho' F, Losa A, Suardi N, Gaboardi F, Del Maschio A, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May 20; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI. Nguyen TA, Fourcade A, Zambon A, Saout K, Deruelle C, Joulin V, Tissot V, Doucet L, Rozet F, Fournier G, Valeri A. Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug 20; 41(8):354.e11-354.e18. PubMed ID: 37391283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy. Kaufmann B, Saba K, Schmidli TS, Stutz S, Bissig L, Britschgi AJ, Schaeren E, Gu A, Langenegger N, Sulser T, Eberli D, Keller EX, Hermanns T, Poyet C. Prostate; 2022 Feb 20; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct 20; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of prostate cancer for men with prior negative biopsies undergoing magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy-naive men: A prospective evaluation of the PLUM cohort. Patel HD, Koehne EL, Shea SM, Bhanji Y, Gerena M, Gorbonos A, Quek ML, Flanigan RC, Goldberg A, Gupta GN. Cancer; 2022 Jan 01; 128(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 34427930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men. Russo F, Mazzetti S, Regge D, Ambrosini I, Giannini V, Manfredi M, De Luca S, Bollito E, Porpiglia F. Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec 01; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P. Eur Urol; 2021 Dec 01; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy? Castellani D, Pace G, Cecchini S, Franzese C, Cicconofri A, Romagnoli D, Del Rosso A, Possanzini M, Paci E, Dellabella M, Pierangeli T. Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct 01; 40(10):452.e9-452.e16. PubMed ID: 35871992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI. Han C, Liu S, Qin XB, Ma S, Zhu LN, Wang XY. Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr 01; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT to stratify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions according to clinically significant prostate cancer risk. Yang J, Tang Y, Zhou C, Zhou M, Li J, Hu S. Prostate; 2023 Apr 01; 83(5):430-439. PubMed ID: 36544382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI? Polanec SH, Bickel H, Wengert GJ, Arnoldner M, Clauser P, Susani M, Shariat SF, Pinker K, Helbich TH, Baltzer PAT. Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb 01; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]