These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 35877327

  • 1. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Saraiva Amaral J, Marto CM, Farias J, Alves Pereira D, Ermida J, Banaco Á, Campos Felino A, Caramelo F, Matos S.
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Jun 25; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 35877327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct 25; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Conventional Rotary Technique and Piezosurgical Technique in the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Comparative Study.
    Hamza SP, Aslam S, Roshni A, Cherian MP, Soman S, Akhila K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Feb 01; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 37272140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of piezo-electric vs conventional drilling bur surgery of impacted lower third molar: a randomized clinical trial.
    Caputo A, Rubino E, Marcianò A, Peditto M, Bellocchio AM, Nucera R, Oteri G.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr 21; 23(1):233. PubMed ID: 37085833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Unerupted Mandibular Third Molars in Children.
    Yang L, Chen Y, Fang W.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun 21; 80(6):1078-1083. PubMed ID: 35300957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of surgical ultrasound used in the detachment of flaps, osteotomy and odontosection in lower third molar surgeries. A prospective, randomized, and "split-mouth" clinical study.
    Silva LD, Reis EN, Bonardi JP, Lima VN, Aranega AM, Ponzoni D.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 Jul 01; 25(4):e461-e467. PubMed ID: 32388527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis.
    Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, Alrmali AE, Alkhutari AS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar 01; 45(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 26572830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary surgery for impacted third molars: A randomised, split-mouth, clinical pilot trial.
    Demirci A, Bayram F, Dergin G.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2024 Jan 01; 29(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 37992138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.