These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
279 related items for PubMed ID: 3592477
1. Test charts for distance preferred for low-vision. Fonda G. Ann Ophthalmol; 1987 May; 19(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 3592477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Low vision rehabilitation: visual acuity measurement in the low vision range. Colenbrander A, Fletcher DC. J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1992 May; 11(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1564739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart. Varadharajan S, Srinivasan K, Kumaresan B. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel high-frequency visual acuity chart. Medina A, Howland B. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988 Sep; 8(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3419824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing]. Veselý P, Ventruba J. Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 20052823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method. Moutakis K, Stigmar G, Hall-Lindberg J. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Design of an Arabic near visual acuity chart. Oduntan AO, al-Abdulmunem MA. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 9196680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A test-instrument for routine diagnosis in visual schools (author's transl)]. Kaufmann H, Dannheim E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1976 Sep; 169(3):381-3. PubMed ID: 1003832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Brabyn J, Schneck ME, Jampolsky A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 9008645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years. Rice ML, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual acuity screening of infants and young children with the acuity card procedure. Dobson V, McDonald MA, Kohl P, Stern N, Samek M, Preston K. J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Apr; 57(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 3700951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem? Gall R, Wick B. Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, 'compact reduced logMar' and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice. Lim LA, Frost NA, Powell RJ, Hewson P. Eye (Lond); 2010 Apr; 24(4):673-7. PubMed ID: 19557025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity. Whatham AR, Mermoud C, Déruaz A, Goldschmidt M, Zesiger P, Safran AB. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16460316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A system for controlled presentation of the Arden contrast sensitivity test. Kobrick JL, Zeltzer HI, Mullen SP. Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Jul; 59(7):667-9. PubMed ID: 3408430 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]