These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

238 related items for PubMed ID: 35940352

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of Postoperative Instability and Acetabular Cup Positioning in Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Shaw JH, Rahman TM, Wesemann LD, Z Jiang C, G Lindsay-Rivera K, Davis JJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8S):S881-S889. PubMed ID: 35143923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Effect of the acetabular cup positioning and leg length restoration after total hip arthroplasty using robotic-assisted surgery system].
    Li Y, Wang XG, Dong ZY, Li ZJ, Tian H, Tao LY.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jan 04; 102(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 34991236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CT-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
    Fontalis A, Kayani B, Plastow R, Giebaly DE, Tahmassebi J, Haddad IC, Chambers A, Mancino F, Konan S, Haddad FS.
    Bone Joint J; 2024 Apr 01; 106-B(4):324-335. PubMed ID: 38555946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.
    Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, Stake CE, Botser IB.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan 01; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Intraoperative Technology Use Improves Accuracy of Functional Safe Zone Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Sicat CS, Buchalter DB, Luthringer TA, Schwarzkopf R, Vigdorchik JM.
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul 01; 37(7S):S540-S545. PubMed ID: 35428540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Consideration of pelvic tilt at the time of preoperative planning improves standing acetabular position after robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty.
    Hepinstall MS, Coden G, Salem HS, Naylor B, Matzko C, Mont MA.
    Hip Int; 2023 Jan 01; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 34510940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Fluoroscopy-based robotic assistance for total hip arthroplasty improves acetabular cup placement accuracy for obese patients compared to the manual, fluoroscopic- assisted technique.
    Ong CB, Buchan GBJ, Hecht Ii CJ, Kendoff DO, Homma Y, Kamath AF.
    Technol Health Care; 2024 Jan 01; 32(5):3703-3712. PubMed ID: 37980587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Automated digital templating of component sizing is accurate in robotic total hip arthroplasty when compared to predicate software.
    Buchan GBJ, Hecht CJ, Rodriguez-Elizalde S, Kabata T, Kamath AF.
    Med Eng Phys; 2024 Feb 01; 124():104105. PubMed ID: 38418018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.