These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 35959521

  • 1. Quality of fetal heart rate monitoring with transabdominal fetal ECG during maternal movement in labor: A prospective study.
    Reis-de-Carvalho C, Nogueira P, Ayres-de-Campos D.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov; 101(11):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 35959521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A novel modality for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ashwal E, Shinar S, Aviram A, Orbach S, Yogev Y, Hiersch L.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(6):889-895. PubMed ID: 29096560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intrapartum non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring: A prospective observational study.
    Lempersz C, Noben L, van Osta G, Wassen MLH, Meershoek BPJ, Bakker P, Jacquemyn Y, Cuerva MJ, Vullings R, Westerhuis MEMH, Oei GS.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 32306380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann H, Heinrich TM, Louwen F.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 Oct; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
    Nurani R, Chandraharan E, Lowe V, Ugwumadu A, Arulkumaran S.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Differences between external and internal fetal heart rate monitoring during the second stage of labor: a prospective observational study.
    Nunes I, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J.
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Jul; 42(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 24445232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Labor: A Comparison of Three Methods.
    Euliano TY, Darmanjian S, Nguyen MT, Busowski JD, Euliano N, Gregg AR.
    J Pregnancy; 2017 Jul; 2017():8529816. PubMed ID: 28392944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Characteristics of maternal heart rate patterns during labor and delivery.
    Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Kurzweil Y, Padua A, Arieli S, Bahar M.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Apr; 99(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 12039107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Characteristics of fetal and maternal heart rate tracings during labor: A prospective observational study.
    Ramadan MK, Fasih R, Itani S, Salem Wehbe GR, Badr DA.
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2019 Apr; 12(4):405-410. PubMed ID: 31609705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram to Doppler cardiotocogram during the 1st stage of labor.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Yi Q, Hatzmann H, Schiermeier S.
    J Perinat Med; 2010 Mar; 38(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 20121540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of Deep Learning to Detect the Maternal Heart Rate and False Signals on Fetal Heart Rate Recordings.
    Boudet S, Houzé de l'Aulnoit A, Peyrodie L, Demailly R, Houzé de l'Aulnoit D.
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Aug 27; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Experiences with intrapartum fetal monitoring in the Netherlands: A survey study.
    Habraken V, Spanjers MJM, van der Woude DAA, Oei SG, van Laar JOEH.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Nov 27; 278():159-165. PubMed ID: 36208521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Non-invasive fetal monitoring: Fetal Heart Rate multimodal estimation from abdominal electrocardiography and phonocardiography.
    Faisant MC, Fontecave-Jallon J, Genoux B, Rivet B, Dia N, Resendiz M, Riethmuller D, Equy V, Hoffmann P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct 27; 51(8):102421. PubMed ID: 35690334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness of ambulatory non-invasive fetal electrocardiography: impact of maternal and fetal characteristics.
    Liu B, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May 27; 102(5):577-584. PubMed ID: 36944583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prelabor short-term variability in fetal heart rate by computerized cardiotocogram and maternal fetal doppler indices for the prediction of labor outcomes.
    Lam MSN, Chaemsaithong P, Kwan AHW, Wong STK, Tse AWT, Sahota DS, Leung TY, Poon LC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Apr 27; 35(7):1318-1327. PubMed ID: 32283958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler telemetry.
    Stampalija T, Signaroldi M, Mastroianni C, Rosti E, Signorelli V, Casati D, Ferrazzi EM.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug 27; 25(8):1517-20. PubMed ID: 22070793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Non-invasive fetal monitoring using electrocardiography and phonocardiography: A preliminary study.
    Gobillot S, Fontecave-Jallon J, Equy V, Rivet B, Gumery PY, Hoffmann P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov 27; 47(9):455-459. PubMed ID: 30144558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Errors and pitfalls in reading the cardiotocographic tracing.
    Di Tommaso M, Seravalli V, Petraglia F.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Apr 27; 71(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 30318881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Loss of FHR variability diagnosed by frequency analysis.
    Maeda K, Nagawawa T.
    J Perinat Med; 2010 Mar 27; 38(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 20121543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.