These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 35972588

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.
    Kumagai T, Shoji T, Yoshikawa Y, Mine I, Kanno J, Ishii H, Saito A, Ishikawa S, Kimura I, Shinoda K.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 104(11):1258-1534. PubMed ID: 32152139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J, Wang H, Kalloniatis M.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kimura T, Matsumoto C, Nomoto H.
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 13():501-513. PubMed ID: 30936681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T, Eslani M, Weinreb RN, Arias J, Vasile C, Mohammadzadeh V, Moghimi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb 01; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Wakayama A, Nomoto H, Chiba Y, Matsumoto C, Kusaka S.
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Jan 01; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 33290308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G, Bryan SR, Crabb DP, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Lanzetta P, Perdicchi A, Johnson CA, Garway-Heath DF, Brusini P, Rossetti LM.
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb 01; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
    Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Drance SM, Gaasterland D, Mills RP, Ashburn F, Hnik P, Van Coevorden RE.
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov 01; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.